Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 38 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 105 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 180 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 427 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Spectro-spatial hyperspectral image reconstruction from interferometric acquisitions (2310.01898v1)

Published 3 Oct 2023 in eess.IV

Abstract: In the last decade, novel hyperspectral cameras have been developed with particularly desirable characteristics of compactness and short acquisition time, retaining their potential to obtain spectral/spatial resolution competitive with respect to traditional cameras. However, a computational effort is required to recover an interpretable data cube. In this work we focus our attention on imaging spectrometers based on interferometry, for which the raw acquisition is an image whose spectral component is expressed as an interferogram. Previous works have focused on the inversion of such acquisition on a pixel-by-pixel basis within a Bayesian framework, leaving behind critical information on the spatial structure of the image data cube. In this work, we address this problem by integrating a spatial regularization for image reconstruction, showing that the combination of spectral and spatial regularizers leads to enhanced performances with respect to the pixelwise case. We compare our results with Plug-and-Play techniques, as its strategy to inject a set of denoisers from the literature can be implemented seamlessly with our physics-based formulation of the optimization problem.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (24)
  1. Michael T. Eismann, Hyperspectral remote sensing, Press Monographs. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, 2012.
  2. Hyperspectral imaging remote sensing: physics, sensors, and algorithms, Cambridge University Press, 2016.
  3. Eugene Hecht, Optics (5th edition), Pearson, 2016.
  4. Parameswaran Hariharan, Basics of interferometry, Elsevier, 2010.
  5. “Model-based spectral reconstruction of interferometric acquisitions,” in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5.
  6. Marco Donatelli and Stefano Serra-Capizzano, Eds., Computational methods for inverse problems in imaging, Springer-Verlag GmbH, 2019.
  7. “Plug-and-play methods for integrating physical and learned models in computational imaging: Theory, algorithms, and applications,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 85–97, 2023.
  8. “Algorithm unrolling: Interpretable, efficient deep learning for signal and image processing,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 18–44, 2021.
  9. “Plug-and-play image restoration with deep denoiser prior,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2021.
  10. “Collaborative total variation: a general framework for vectorial tv models,” SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 116–151, 2016.
  11. “A hyperspectral imager based on a fabry-perot interferometer with dielectric mirrors,” Optics Express, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1824–1834, 2014.
  12. “Multi-aperture snapshot compressive hyperspectral camera,” Optics Letters, vol. 43, no. 20, pp. 5042–5045, 2018.
  13. “Compact imaging spectrometer combining fourier transform spectroscopy with a fabry-perot interferometer,” Optics Express, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 8319–8331, 2009.
  14. “Interferometer response characterization algorithm for multi-aperture fabry-perot imaging spectrometers,” Optics Express, vol. 31, no. 14, pp. 23066–23085, 2023.
  15. “On a generalization of the iterative soft-thresholding algorithm for the case of non-separable penalty,” Inverse Problems, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 125007, 2011.
  16. Jérôme Idier, Bayesian approach to inverse problems, John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
  17. Parameswaran Hariharan, Optical interferometry, 2e, Elsevier, 2003.
  18. Laurent Condat, “Discrete total variation: New definition and minimization,” SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1258–1290, 2017.
  19. “Proximal splitting algorithms for convex optimization: A tour of recent advances, with new twists,” SIAM Review, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 375–435, may 2023.
  20. “Proximal algorithms,” Foundations and trends® in Optimization, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 127–239, 2014.
  21. “Plug-and-Play priors for model based reconstruction,” in IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP). 2013, IEEE.
  22. “Linearized augmented Lagrangian and alternating direction methods for nuclear norm minimization,” Mathematics of Computation, vol. 82, no. 281, pp. 301–329, mar 2012.
  23. “Scientific computational imaging code (SCICO),” Journal of Open Source Software, vol. 7, no. LA-UR-22-28555, 2022.
  24. “Image restoration by sparse 3D transform-domain collaborative filtering,” in SPIE Proceedings, Jaakko T. Astola, Karen O. Egiazarian, and Edward R. Dougherty, Eds. feb 2008, SPIE.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.