Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Enabling Language Models to Implicitly Learn Self-Improvement (2310.00898v4)

Published 2 Oct 2023 in cs.CL

Abstract: LLMs have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in open-ended text generation tasks. However, the inherent open-ended nature of these tasks implies that there is always room for improvement in the quality of model responses. To address this challenge, various approaches have been proposed to enhance the performance of LLMs. There has been a growing focus on enabling LLMs to self-improve their response quality, thereby reducing the reliance on extensive human annotation efforts for collecting diverse and high-quality training data. Recently, prompting-based methods have been widely explored among self-improvement methods owing to their effectiveness, efficiency, and convenience. However, those methods usually require explicitly and thoroughly written rubrics as inputs to LLMs. It is expensive and challenging to manually derive and provide all necessary rubrics with a real-world complex goal for improvement (e.g., being more helpful and less harmful). To this end, we propose an ImPlicit Self-ImprovemenT (PIT) framework that implicitly learns the improvement goal from human preference data. PIT only requires preference data that are used to train reward models without extra human efforts. Specifically, we reformulate the training objective of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) -- instead of maximizing response quality for a given input, we maximize the quality gap of the response conditioned on a reference response. In this way, PIT is implicitly trained with the improvement goal of better aligning with human preferences. Experiments on two real-world datasets and one synthetic dataset show that our method significantly outperforms prompting-based methods.

PDF HTML Abstract

Enabling LLMs to Implicitly Learn Self-Improvement

The efficacy and capabilities of LLMs in diverse open-ended text generation tasks have significantly advanced, yet there remains substantial potential for enhancing the quality of their responses. The paper "Enabling LLMs to Implicitly Learn Self-Improvement" proposes an innovative approach to address this challenge, focusing on implicit learning of self-improvement goals derived from human preference data. The proposed method, ImPlicit Self-ImprovemenT (PIT), distinguishes itself from traditional prompting-based methods by alleviating the need for meticulously crafted improvement rubrics, which are often labor-intensive and challenging to compose comprehensively.

Methodology and Approach

At the core of the paper is the PIT framework, which leverages the concept of self-improvement through reformulating the reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) paradigm. Unlike prevailing approaches that concentrate on fine-tuning LLMs by maximizing response quality, PIT aims to maximize the quality gap between improved and reference responses. The proposed framework employs a reward model trained explicitly to discern this quality gap, thereby encapsulating implicit improvement goals without additional human-authored rubrics. This distinctive approach allows PIT to be trained on preference data already in use for reward modeling, effectively bypassing the need for additional human effort.

The PIT framework encompasses several key innovations, including:

  • Reformulating RLHF objectives to focus on quality gap maximization.
  • Implementing a curriculum reinforcement learning strategy that incrementally increases task difficulty, enhancing model training efficacy.

Empirical Evaluations

The authors rigorously evaluate PIT across multiple datasets, including Anthropic/HH-RLHF and OpenAI/Summary, showcasing the framework's ability to outperform conventional prompting methods like Self-Refine. The experiments indicate that PIT consistently enhances response quality over original outputs, with results evaluated using both third-party LLMs (e.g., GPT-4) and reward models such as DeBERTa. Furthermore, PIT demonstrates robust performance in scenarios characterized by complex and domain-specific improvement goals, underscoring its potential applicability across various domains.

Implications and Future Prospects

The PIT framework's capacity to learn from implicit signals presents notable theoretical and practical implications in AI research. By reducing reliance on manual rubric design, PIT can facilitate faster adaptation and scalability of LLMs to new tasks or domains, particularly those necessitating specific expertise. As self-improvement mechanisms advance, we foresee potential developments in automated feedback systems and the incorporation of additional modalities like visual or auditory feedback to further refine LLM responses.

Moreover, PIT's enhanced ability to autonomously align with human preferences without extensive re-training implies a future where LLMs can continually refine interactions across diverse linguistic inquiries, enhancing user experiences. Future research might explore integration with multi-modal systems and further refinement of reward models to address the challenges identified in RLHF, thus pushing the bounds of self-optimized LLMs even further.

Conclusion

The "Enabling LLMs to Implicitly Learn Self-Improvement" paper presents a compelling advancement in LLM optimization, laying groundwork for future explorations into autonomous language understanding and generation. PIT's approach not only optimizes practical application by simplifying improvement workflows but also adds a significant theoretical contribution to the discourse on AI alignment and self-improvement. Through this framework, LLMs exhibit not just the capacity to learn, but importantly, the ability to refine and adapt in alignment with nuanced human-centric goals, ushering in an era of more sophisticated, versatile, and self-improving AI systems.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown Bookmark Chat Bubble Oval Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Chat (Pro)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (42)
  1. Palm 2 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10403, 2023.
  2. A general language assistant as a laboratory for alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.00861, 2021.
  3. Training a helpful and harmless assistant with reinforcement learning from human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.05862, 2022.
  4. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877–1901, 2020.
  5. Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with gpt-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12712, 2023.
  6. Teaching large language models to self-debug. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05128, 2023.
  7. Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.02311, 2022.
  8. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805, 2018.
  9. Raft: Reward ranked finetuning for generative foundation model alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.06767, 2023.
  10. Red teaming language models to reduce harms: Methods, scaling behaviors, and lessons learned. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.07858, 2022.
  11. Reinforced self-training (rest) for language modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08998, 2023.
  12. Deberta: Decoding-enhanced bert with disentangled attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.03654, 2020.
  13. Large language models can self-improve. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.11610, 2022.
  14. Tpu v4: An optically reconfigurable supercomputer for machine learning with hardware support for embeddings. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pp.  1–14, 2023.
  15. Open-domain hierarchical event schema induction by incremental prompting and verification. In Proc. The 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL2023), 2023.
  16. Languages are rewards: Hindsight finetuning using human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02676, 2023.
  17. Quark: Controllable text generation with reinforced unlearning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:27591–27609, 2022.
  18. Self-refine: Iterative refinement with self-feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17651, 2023.
  19. OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv, pp.  2303–08774, 2023.
  20. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:27730–27744, 2022.
  21. Instruction tuning with gpt-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03277, 2023.
  22. Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18290, 2023.
  23. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 21(1), jan 2020. ISSN 1532-4435.
  24. Chatgpt: Optimizing language models for dialogue. OpenAI blog, 2022.
  25. Mixture-of-experts meets instruction tuning: A winning combination for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14705, 2023.
  26. Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11366, 2023.
  27. Large language models encode clinical knowledge. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.13138, 2022.
  28. Defining and characterizing reward gaming. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:9460–9471, 2022.
  29. Learning to summarize from human feedback. In NeurIPS, 2020a.
  30. Learning to summarize with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:3008–3021, 2020b.
  31. Principle-driven self-alignment of language models from scratch with minimal human supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.03047, 2023.
  32. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288, 2023.
  33. Leti: Learning to generate from textual interactions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10314, 2023a.
  34. Mint: Evaluating llms in multi-turn interaction with tools and language feedback, 2023b.
  35. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:24824–24837, 2022.
  36. Neural text generation with unlikelihood training. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.04319, 2019.
  37. Rcot: Detecting and rectifying factual inconsistency in reasoning by reversing chain-of-thought. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11499, 2023.
  38. Meta-review generation with checklist-guided iterative introspection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14647, 2023.
  39. Investigating the catastrophic forgetting in multimodal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.10313, 2023.
  40. Slic-hf: Sequence likelihood calibration with human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10425, 2023.
  41. Judging llm-as-a-judge with mt-bench and chatbot arena. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05685, 2023.
  42. Solving challenging math word problems using gpt-4 code interpreter with code-based self-verification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.07921, 2023.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Ziqi Wang (92 papers)
  2. Le Hou (36 papers)
  3. Tianjian Lu (8 papers)
  4. Yuexin Wu (23 papers)
  5. Yunxuan Li (14 papers)
  6. Hongkun Yu (17 papers)
  7. Heng Ji (266 papers)
Citations (3)
View on Semantic Scholar
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

YouTube