Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Auditing the Compliance and Enforcement of Twitter's Advertising Policy (2309.12591v2)

Published 22 Sep 2023 in cs.CY, cs.CR, cs.HC, and cs.SI

Abstract: Online platforms have enacted various policies to maintain a safe and trustworthy advertising environment. However, the extent to which these policies are adhered to and enforced remains a subject of interest and concern. In this work, we present a large-scale audit of adult advertising on Twitter (now X), specifically focusing on compliance with its adult (sexual) content advertising policy. Twitter is an interesting case study in that it -- uniquely from other social media platforms -- allows posting of adult content but prohibits adult content in advertising. We analyze approximately 35 thousand ads on Twitter with respect to their compliance to the adult content ad policy through Perspective API and manual annotations. Among other things, we find that nearly 38% of ads violate Twitter's adult content advertising policy, although the platform eventually removed only about 63% of these non-compliant adult ads. We also find inconsistencies in the moderation of such ads across languages, highlighting the need for more reliable and consistent moderation practices across various languages. Overall, our findings highlight blind spots in Twitter's adult ad policy enforcement for certain languages and countries. Our work underscores the importance of external audits to monitor compliance and improve transparency in online advertising.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (110)
  1. A statistical learning approach to detect abusive twitter accounts. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Compute and Data Analysis, 6–13.
  2. The effect of culture on customers’ attitudes toward Facebook advertising: the moderating role of gender. Review of International Business and Strategy, 31(3): 416–437.
  3. The fight against disinformation and its consequences: Measuring the impact of “Russia state-affiliated media” on Twitter.
  4. All things unequal: Measuring disparity of potentially harmful ads on facebook. In 6th Workshop on Technology and Consumer Protection.
  5. Discrimination through optimization: How Facebook’s Ad delivery can lead to biased outcomes. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, 3(CSCW): 1–30.
  6. Content Moderation As a Political Issue: The Twitter Discourse Around Trump’s Ban. Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media, 2.
  7. Think before your click: Data and models for adult content in arabic twitter. In TA-COS 2018: 2nd Workshop on Text Analytics for Cybersecurity and Online Safety, volume 15.
  8. Measuring the Facebook advertising ecosystem. In NDSS 2019-Proceedings of the Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, 1–15.
  9. Acting the part: Examining information operations within# BlackLivesMatter discourse. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW): 1–27.
  10. Measuring social media influencer index-insights from Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 49: 86–101.
  11. The human cost of online content moderation. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology.
  12. Political advertising exposed: tracking Facebook ads in the 2021 Dutch elections. Internet Policy Review (Mar. 11, 2021). URL: https://policyreview. info/articles/news/politicaladvertising-exposed-tracking-facebook-ads-2021-dutch-elections/1543.
  13. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment, 2008(10): P10008.
  14. Borah, P. 2016. Political Facebook use: Campaign strategies used in 2008 and 2012 presidential elections. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(4): 326–338.
  15. How are major gambling brands using Twitter? International Gambling Studies, 19(3): 451–470.
  16. Fake news, real money: Ad tech platforms, profit-driven hoaxes, and the business of journalism. Digital Journalism, 7(1): 1–21.
  17. Twitter and politics: Evidence from the US presidential elections 2016. Journal of Marketing Communications, 26(1): 88–114.
  18. Business, T. 2023a. Twitter’s Adult Sexual Content Advertising Policy. https://business.twitter.com/en/help/ads-policies/ads-content-policies/adult-or-sexual-products-and-services.html.
  19. Business, T. 2023b. Twitter’s Political Content Advertising Policy. https://web.archive.org/web/20230104003827/https://business.twitter.com/en/help/ads-policies/ads-content-policies/political-content.html. [Accessed on 04-January-2023].
  20. Unveiling and quantifying Facebook exploitation of sensitive personal data for advertising purposes. In 27th {normal-{\{{USENIX}normal-}\}} Security Symposium ({normal-{\{{USENIX}normal-}\}} Security 18), 479–495.
  21. Characterizing Early Electoral Advertisements on Twitter: A Brazilian Case Study. In Social Informatics: 13th International Conference, SocInfo 2022, Glasgow, UK, October 19–21, 2022, Proceedings, 257–272. Springer.
  22. The role of bot squads in the political propaganda on Twitter. Communications Physics, 3(1): 81.
  23. Global spaces for local politics: An exploratory analysis of Facebook Ads in Spanish election campaigns. Social Sciences, 10(7): 271.
  24. Disinformation in Facebook ads in the 2019 Spanish general election campaigns. Media And Communication, 2021, vol. 9, num. 1, p. 217-228.
  25. Facebook Ads: Politics of Migration in Italy. In Social Informatics: 12th International Conference, SocInfo 2020, Pisa, Italy, October 6–9, 2020, Proceedings 12, 43–57. Springer.
  26. Center, M. T. 2023a. Facebook’s Adult Content Advertising Policy: Adult Content. https://transparency.fb.com/policies/ad-standards/objectionable-content/adult-content.
  27. Center, M. T. 2023b. Facebook’s Political Content Advertising Policy: Ads about Social Issues, Elections or Politics. https://transparency.fb.com/policies/ad-standards/SIEP-advertising/SIEP.
  28. Center, T. H. 2018. How to post links in a Tweet? https://help.twitter.com/en/using-twitter/how-to-tweet-a-link.
  29. ISC: An iterative social based classifier for adult account detection on twitter. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 27(4): 1045–1056.
  30. Chiu, Y.-P. 2022. An elaboration likelihood model of Facebook advertising effectiveness: Self-monitoring as a moderator. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 23(1): 33–44.
  31. Sexual ad appeals in social media: Effects and influences of cultural difference and sexual self-schema. International Journal of Advertising, 41(5): 910–929.
  32. Vaporous marketing: uncovering pervasive electronic cigarette advertisements on Twitter. PloS one, 11(7): e0157304.
  33. Elon Musk Completes $44 Billion Deal to Own Twitter. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/27/technology/elon-musk-twitter-deal-complete.html. Published on 27 October 2022.
  34. Modulating moderation: A history of objectionability in Twitter moderation practices.
  35. Detection of spammers disseminating obscene content on Twitter. International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining, 21(3): 265–289.
  36. The political economy of Facebook advertising: Election spending, regulation and targeting online. The Political Quarterly, 90(2): 257–265.
  37. Duffy, C. 2022. After Elon Musk’s antics on Twitter, advertisers may think twice for now. https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/01/tech/elon-musk-twitter-advertising-fallout/index.html. Published on 01 November 2022.
  38. A security analysis of the facebook ad library. In 2020 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), 661–678. IEEE.
  39. Elon Musk’s Twitter Takeover: A Timeline Of Events. 2023. Elon Musk’s Twitter Takeover: A Timeline Of Events. https://www.searchenginejournal.com/elon-musks-twitter-takeover-a-timeline-of-events/470927/“#close. [Accessed on 01-May-2023].
  40. European Commission. 2023. The Digital Services Act package. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/digital-services-act-package.
  41. Large scale crowdsourcing and characterization of twitter abusive behavior. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, volume 12.
  42. Political advertising online and offline. American Political Science Review, 115(1): 130–149.
  43. The effects of ad social and personal relevance on consumer ad engagement on social media: The moderating role of platform trust. Computers in human behavior, 122: 106834.
  44. Cross-platform state propaganda: Russian trolls on Twitter and YouTube during the 2016 US presidential election. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(3): 357–389.
  45. Algorithmic content moderation: Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. Big Data & Society, 7(1): 2053951719897945.
  46. Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election. Science, 363(6425): 374–378.
  47. Growing number of companies are freezing their Twitter ads after Elon Musk takeover. 2022. Growing number of companies are freezing their Twitter ads after Elon Musk takeover. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/twitter-elon-musk-general-mills-audi-pause-ads/. Published on 4th November 2022.
  48. Disproportionate removals and differing content moderation experiences for conservative, transgender, and black social media users: Marginalization and moderation gray areas. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2): 1–35.
  49. How advertising relevance and consumer–Brand relationship strength limit disclosure effects of native ads on Twitter. International Journal of Advertising, 39(1): 131–165.
  50. On the globalization of the QAnon conspiracy theory through Telegram. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Web Science Conference 2023, 75–85.
  51. H.R.6796 - Digital Services Oversight and Safety Act of 2022. 2022. H.R.6796 - Digital Services Oversight and Safety Act of 2022. https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/6796/text.
  52. Detecting malicious activity in Twitter using deep learning techniques. Applied Soft Computing, 107: 107360.
  53. Introduction to the Advertising Standards on Facebook. 2023. Introduction to the Advertising Standards on Facebook. https://transparency.fb.com/policies/ad-standards. [Accessed on 01-May-2023].
  54. Vaccine-related advertising in the Facebook Ad Archive. Vaccine, 38(3): 512–520.
  55. Janson, S. 2022. Pandemic-era Advertising: A Study of the Twitter Advertising of Four Online Food Delivery Companies During the 2020 Pandemic.
  56. Evaluating the effectiveness of deplatforming as a moderation strategy on Twitter. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2): 1–30.
  57. Jigsaw. 2017. Google Perspective API. https://perspectiveapi.com.
  58. Jiménez Durán, R. 2022. The economics of content moderation: Theory and experimental evidence from hate speech on Twitter. Available at SSRN.
  59. Facts and where to find them: Empirical research on internet platforms and content moderation. Social media and democracy: The state of the field and prospects for reform, 220: 224.
  60. Why am I seeing this ad? The effect of ad transparency on ad effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(5): 906–932.
  61. Knoll, J. 2016. Advertising in social media: a review of empirical evidence. International journal of Advertising, 35(2): 266–300.
  62. The “arbiters of what our voters see”: Facebook and Google’s struggle with policy, process, and enforcement around political advertising. Political Communication, 36(4): 499–522.
  63. An Audit of Facebook’s Political Ad Policy Enforcement. In 31st USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 22), 607–624.
  64. Politics in the Facebook era-evidence from the 2016 US presidential elections.
  65. Maddocks, S. 2020. ‘A Deepfake Porn Plot Intended to Silence Me’: exploring continuities between pornographic and ‘political’deep fakes. Porn Studies, 7(4): 415–423.
  66. Emotion regulation and desire thinking as predictors of problematic Facebook use. Psychiatric Quarterly, 90: 405–411.
  67. Software-Supported Audits of Decision-Making Systems: Testing Google and Facebook’s Political Advertising Policies. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW1): 1–19.
  68. Umap: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03426.
  69. Can online political targeting be rendered transparent? Prospects for campaign oversight using the Facebook Ad Library. Internet Policy Review, 11(1): 1–31.
  70. COVID-19 on Facebook ads: competing agendas around a public health crisis. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies, 22–31.
  71. Meta. 2019. Facebook Ad Archival Library. https://www.facebook.com/ads/library/.
  72. Meta Advertising. 2023. Meta Advertising. https://www.facebook.com/business/ads. [Accessed on 01-May-2023].
  73. The emerging science of content labeling: Contextualizing social media content moderation. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(10): 1365–1386.
  74. EarlyAd: A System for Real-Time Surveillance of Brazilian Early Electoral Ads on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, 225–227.
  75. Adult content detection on arabic twitter: Analysis and experiments. In Proceedings of the Sixth Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop, 136–144.
  76. Myers West, S. 2018. Censored, suspended, shadowbanned: User interpretations of content moderation on social media platforms. New Media & Society, 20(11): 4366–4383.
  77. The relationship between consumer engagements with Super Bowl ad tweets and the advertisers’ official Twitter accounts: a panel data analysis of 2019 Super Bowl advertisers. International Journal of Advertising, 40(6): 852–869.
  78. The Twitter presidency: Donald J. Trump and the politics of white rage. Routledge.
  79. The spread of COVID-19 conspiracy theories on social media and the effect of content moderation. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1(3).
  80. Mind games: A temporal sentiment analysis of the political messages of the Internet Research Agency on Facebook and Twitter. New Media & Society, 25(3): 463–484.
  81. Peters, J. 2022. Twitter cut 15 percent of its trust and safety staff but says it won’t impact moderation. https://www.theverge.com/2022/11/4/23441404/twitter-trust-safety-staff-layoffs-content-moderation. Published on 04 November 2022.
  82. Platform, T. D. 2020. Twitter’s Tweet Lookup API. https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/twitter-api/tweets/lookup/api-reference/get-tweets.
  83. Platform, T. D. 2022. Twitter’s Streaming API - Volume streams. https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/twitter-api/tweets/volume-streams/introduction.
  84. PyPi. 2018. Google Translate API. https://pypi.org/project/googletrans/.
  85. A longitudinal study of the top 1% toxic Twitter profiles. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Web Science Conference 2023, 292–303.
  86. Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  87. On microtargeting socially divisive ads: A case study of russia-linked ad campaigns on facebook. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, 140–149.
  88. Facebook ads monitor: An independent auditing system for political ads on facebook. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020, 224–234.
  89. Behavioral analysis and classification of spammers distributing pornographic content in social media. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 6: 1–18.
  90. On Detecting Policy-Related Political Ads: An Exploratory Analysis of Meta Ads in 2022 French Election. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.06917.
  91. Disinformation as collaborative work: Surfacing the participatory nature of strategic information operations. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW): 1–26.
  92. For whom the bot tolls: A neural networks approach to measuring political orientation of Twitter bots in Russia. Sage Open, 9(2): 2158244019827715.
  93. Where Are You Taking Me?Understanding Abusive Traffic Distribution Systems. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021, WWW ’21, 3613–3624. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450383127.
  94. Cross-Platform Dynamics of Self-Generated CSAM. Stanford Internet Observatory, Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies.
  95. Turkel, E. 2022. Regulating online political advertising. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022, 3584–3593.
  96. Twitter Advertising. 2023. Twitter Advertising. https://business.twitter.com/en/help/troubleshooting/how-twitter-ads-work.html. [Accessed on 01-May-2023].
  97. Twitter’s Ad Manager Platform. 2023. Twitter’s Ad Manager Platform. https://ads.twitter.com/. [Accessed on 09-November-2023].
  98. Twitter’s Prohibited Content Policies. 2023. Twitter’s Prohibited Content Policies. https://business.twitter.com/en/help/ads-policies/ads-content-policies.html. [Accessed on 01-May-2023].
  99. Twitter’s sacking of content moderators raises concerns. 2022. Twitter’s sacking of content moderators raises concerns. https://www.dw.com/en/twitters-sacking-of-content-moderators-will-backfire-experts-warn/a-63778330“#:~:text=Elon“%20Musk“%20has“%20fired“%20a,Experts“%20are“%20alarmed. Published on 16th November 2022.
  100. Fear, anger, and political advertisement engagement: A computational case study of Russian-linked Facebook and Instagram content. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(3): 743–761.
  101. The Inventory is Dark and Full of Misinformation: Understanding the Abuse of Ad Inventory Pooling in the Ad-Tech Supply Chain. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.06654.
  102. Vesnic-Alujevic, L. 2016. European elections and Facebook: Political advertising and deliberation? In (R) evolutionizing political communication through social media, 191–209. IGI Global.
  103. VirusTotal. 2004. VirusTotal API. https://www.virustotal.com/.
  104. What twitter knows: characterizing ad targeting practices, user perceptions, and ad explanations through users’ own twitter data. In Proceedings of the 29th USENIX Conference on Security Symposium, 145–162.
  105. Trump, Twitter, and news media responsiveness: A media systems approach. New media & society, 22(4): 659–682.
  106. No polarization from partisan news: Over-time evidence from trace data. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19401612211047194.
  107. X’s brand safety efforts called into question (again) as MRC and TAG credentials hang in the balance. 2023. X’s brand safety efforts called into question (again) as MRC and TAG credentials hang in the balance. https://digiday.com/marketing/xs-brand-safety-efforts-called-into-question-again-as-mrc-and-tag-credentials-hang-in-the-balance/. Published on 4th September 2023.
  108. Newsfeed native advertising on Facebook: young millennials’ knowledge, pet peeves, reactance and ad avoidance. International Journal of Advertising, 38(5): 651–683.
  109. What makes a “bad” ad? user perceptions of problematic online advertising. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–24.
  110. Polls, clickbait, and commemorative $2 bills: problematic political advertising on news and media websites around the 2020 US elections. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Internet Measurement Conference, 507–525.
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now

Whiteboard

Paper to Video (Beta)

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up