Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Provable Advantage in Quantum PAC Learning (2309.10887v1)

Published 19 Sep 2023 in quant-ph

Abstract: We revisit the problem of characterising the complexity of Quantum PAC learning, as introduced by Bshouty and Jackson [SIAM J. Comput. 1998, 28, 1136-1153]. Several quantum advantages have been demonstrated in this setting, however, none are generic: they apply to particular concept classes and typically only work when the distribution that generates the data is known. In the general case, it was recently shown by Arunachalam and de Wolf [JMLR, 19 (2018) 1-36] that quantum PAC learners can only achieve constant factor advantages over classical PAC learners. We show that with a natural extension of the definition of quantum PAC learning used by Arunachalam and de Wolf, we can achieve a generic advantage in quantum learning. To be precise, for any concept class $\mathcal{C}$ of VC dimension $d$, we show there is an $(\epsilon, \delta)$-quantum PAC learner with sample complexity [ O\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\epsilon}}\left[d+ \log(\frac{1}{\delta})\right]\log9(1/\epsilon)\right). ] Up to polylogarithmic factors, this is a square root improvement over the classical learning sample complexity. We show the tightness of our result by proving an $\Omega(d/\sqrt{\epsilon})$ lower bound that matches our upper bound up to polylogarithmic factors.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (29)
  1. L.G. Valiant “A Theory of the Learnable” In Commun. ACM 27.11 New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 1984, pp. 1134–1142 DOI: 10.1145/1968.1972
  2. “On the Uniform Convergence of Relative Frequencies of Events to Their Probabilities” In Theory of Probability & Its Applications 16.2, 1971, pp. 264–280 DOI: 10.1137/1116025
  3. “Learnability and the Vapnik-Chervonenkis Dimension” In J. ACM 36.4 New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 1989, pp. 929–965 DOI: 10.1145/76359.76371
  4. Steve Hanneke “The Optimal Sample Complexity of PAC Learning” In Journal of Machine Learning Research 17.38, 2016, pp. 1–15 URL: http://jmlr.org/papers/v17/15-389.html
  5. Nader H Bshouty and Jeffrey C Jackson “Learning DNF over the uniform distribution using a quantum example oracle” In Proceedings of the eighth annual conference on Computational learning theory, 1995, pp. 118–127 DOI: 10.1137/S0097539795293123
  6. “Guest Column: A Survey of Quantum Learning Theory” In SIGACT News 48.2 New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2017, pp. 41–67 DOI: 10.1145/3106700.3106710
  7. Srinivasan Arunachalam, Yihui Quek and John Smolin “Private learning implies quantum stability” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.07171, 2021
  8. Haoyuan Cai, Qi Ye and Dong-Ling Deng “Sample complexity of learning parametric quantum circuits” In Quantum Science and Technology 7.2 IOP Publishing, 2022, pp. 025014
  9. “Quantum Complexity Theory” In SIAM Journal on Computing 26.5, 1997, pp. 1411–1473 DOI: 10.1137/S0097539796300921
  10. Thomas Chen, Shivam Nadimpalli and Henry Yuen “Testing and Learning Quantum Juntas Nearly Optimally” In Proceedings of the 2023 Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 2023, pp. 1163–1185 DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611977554.ch43
  11. “Optimal Quantum Sample Complexity of Learning Algorithms” In Journal of Machine Learning Research 19.71, 2018, pp. 1–36 URL: http://jmlr.org/papers/v19/18-195.html
  12. “Superpolynomial quantum-classical separation for density modeling” In Phys. Rev. A 107 American Physical Society, 2023, pp. 042416 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.107.042416
  13. Scott Aaronson “The learnability of quantum states” In Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 463.2088 The Royal Society London, 2007, pp. 3089–3114
  14. “Sample efficient algorithms for learning quantum channels in PAC model and the approximate state discrimination problem” In arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.10938, 2018
  15. Andrea Rocchetto “Stabiliser States Are Efficiently PAC-Learnable” In Quantum Info. Comput. 18.7–8 Paramus, NJ: Rinton Press, Incorporated, 2018, pp. 541–552
  16. “PAC Learning of Quantum Measurement Classes: Sample Complexity Bounds and Universal Consistency” In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 2022, pp. 11305–11319 PMLR
  17. Hao-Chung Cheng, Min-Hsiu Hsieh and Ping-Cheng Yeh “The learnability of unknown quantum measurements” In arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.00559, 2015
  18. Chi Zhang “An improved lower bound on query complexity for quantum PAC learning” In Information Processing Letters 111.1 Elsevier, 2010, pp. 40–45
  19. “Mean estimation when you have the source code; or, quantum Monte Carlo methods” In Proceedings of the 2023 Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 2023, pp. 1186–1215 DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611977554.ch44
  20. “Quantum tomography using state-preparation unitaries” In Proceedings of the 2023 Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 2023, pp. 1265–1318 DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611977554.ch47
  21. “Query-optimal estimation of unitary channels in diamond distance” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.14066, 2023
  22. “Exponential Separation between Two Learning Models and Adversarial Robustness” In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 Curran Associates, Inc., 2021, pp. 20785–20797 URL: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2021/file/ae06fbdc519bddaa88aa1b24bace4500-Paper.pdf
  23. “Tight Bounds on Quantum Searching” In Fortschritte der Physik 46.4-5, 1998, pp. 493–505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-3978(199806)46:4/5¡493::AID-PROP493¿3.0.CO;2-P
  24. Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang “Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition” Cambridge University Press, 2010 DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511976667
  25. Lov K. Grover “A Fast Quantum Mechanical Algorithm for Database Search” In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’96 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 1996, pp. 212–219 DOI: 10.1145/237814.237866
  26. “Second Order PAC-Bayesian Bounds for the Weighted Majority Vote” In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 Curran Associates, Inc., 2020, pp. 5263–5273 URL: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2020/file/386854131f58a556343e056f03626e00-Paper.pdf
  27. Wassily Hoeffding “Probability Inequalities for Sums of Bounded Random Variables” In Journal of the American Statistical Association 58.301 Taylor & Francis, 1963, pp. 13–30 DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1963.10500830
  28. Richard P Anstee, Lajos Rónyai and Attila Sali “Shattering news” In Graphs and Combinatorics 18 Springer, 2002, pp. 59–73 DOI: 10.1007/s003730200003
  29. Alp Atici and Rocco A. Servedio “Quantum Algorithms for Learning and Testing Juntas” In Quantum Information Processing 6, 2007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-007-0061-6
Citations (5)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Slide Deck Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Whiteboard

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.