Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

A method to discriminate between localized and chaotic quantum systems

Published 20 Jul 2023 in quant-ph and cond-mat.quant-gas | (2307.10706v3)

Abstract: We study whether a generic isolated quantum system initially set out of equilibrium can be considered as localized close to its initial state. Our approach considers the time evolution in the Krylov basis, which maps the dynamics onto that of a particle moving in a one-dimensional lattice where both the energy in the lattice sites and the tunneling from one lattice site to the next are inhomogeneous. By tying the dynamical propagation in the Krylov basis to that in the basis of microstates, we infer qualitative criteria to distinguish systems that remain localized close to their initial state from systems that undergo quantum thermalization. These criteria are system-dependent and involve the expectation values and standard deviations of both the coupling strengths between Krylov states and their energy. We verify their validity by inspecting two cases: Anderson localization as a function of dimension and the out-of-equilibrium dynamics of a many-body dipolar spin system. We finally investigate the Wigner surmise and the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, which have both been proposed to characterize quantum chaotic systems. We show that when the average value of the non-diagonal terms in the Lanczos matrix is large compared to their fluctuations and to the fluctuations of the energy expectation values, which typically corresponds to delocalized quantum systems according to our criteria, there can be level repulsion of eigen-energies (also known as spectral rigidity), similar to that of the Wigner-Dyson statistics of energy levels; and we also demonstrate that in the same regime, the expectation values of typical local observables only weakly vary as a function of eigenstates, an important condition for the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis. Our demonstration assumes that, in the chaotic regime, the observable is sufficiently diagonal in the basis of Krylov states.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (14)
  1. J. M. Deutsch Phys. Rev. A 43, 2046 (1991)
  2. Joshua M Deutsch 2018 Rep. Prog. Phys. 81 082001 (2018)
  3. Yichen Huang, https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.01173
  4. C. Nation and D. Porras, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 55 475303 (2022)
  5. We define a micro-state (or a configuration) as generally describing a fully separable state of a large ensemble atoms labelled by the individual states of each single particle ; for example the micro-state can be characterized by all the atoms’ velocities and positions, or by all their individual spin states.
  6. C Castellani and L Peliti J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 19 L429 (1986).
  7. The Lanczos procedure may stop after a given index nm⁢a⁢xsubscript𝑛𝑚𝑎𝑥n_{max}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m italic_a italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT when all possible orthonormal states have been exhausted and a state of zero norm is produced. nm⁢a⁢xsubscript𝑛𝑚𝑎𝑥n_{max}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m italic_a italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT defines the Krylov space dimension.
  8. B. Kramer and A. MacKinnon Rep. Prog. Phys. 56 1469 (1993)
  9. We also point out that the variations of the diagonal and non-diagonal terms of the Lanczos matrix are in fact deterministic. However, they typically show fluctuations whose variance is sufficient to infer a localization criterion.
  10. F M Izrailev et al, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31 5263 (1998)
  11. J B Pendry, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 15 5773 (1982)
  12. In the case of spin dynamics, each microstate is typically coupled to R=O⁢(N2)𝑅𝑂superscript𝑁2R=O(N^{2})italic_R = italic_O ( italic_N start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) other microstates (corresponding to spin flips between N⁢(N−1)/2𝑁𝑁12N(N-1)/2italic_N ( italic_N - 1 ) / 2 pairs of atoms) due to the action of hCsubscriptℎ𝐶h_{C}italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.
  13. Jonathan Breuer et al, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 F161 (2017)
  14. S. Khlebnikov and M. Kruczenski arXiv:1312.4612v2
Citations (1)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.