Domain Adaptation using Silver Standard Labels for Ki-67 Scoring in Digital Pathology: A Step Closer to Widescale Deployment (2307.03872v1)
Abstract: Deep learning systems have been proposed to improve the objectivity and efficiency of Ki- 67 PI scoring. The challenge is that while very accurate, deep learning techniques suffer from reduced performance when applied to out-of-domain data. This is a critical challenge for clinical translation, as models are typically trained using data available to the vendor, which is not from the target domain. To address this challenge, this study proposes a domain adaptation pipeline that employs an unsupervised framework to generate silver standard (pseudo) labels in the target domain, which is used to augment the gold standard (GS) source domain data. Five training regimes were tested on two validated Ki-67 scoring architectures (UV-Net and piNET), (1) SS Only: trained on target silver standard (SS) labels, (2) GS Only: trained on source GS labels, (3) Mixed: trained on target SS and source GS labels, (4) GS+SS: trained on source GS labels and fine-tuned on target SS labels, and our proposed method (5) SS+GS: trained on source SS labels and fine-tuned on source GS labels. The SS+GS method yielded significantly (p < 0.05) higher PI accuracy (95.9%) and more consistent results compared to the GS Only model on target data. Analysis of t-SNE plots showed features learned by the SS+GS models are more aligned for source and target data, resulting in improved generalization. The proposed pipeline provides an efficient method for learning the target distribution without manual annotations, which are time-consuming and costly to generate for medical images. This framework can be applied to any target site as a per-laboratory calibration method, for widescale deployment.
- Ki-67 as a prognostic biomarker in invasive breast cancer. Cancers (Basel), 13(17):4455, 2021.
- Assessment of ki67 in breast cancer: recommendations from the international ki67 in breast cancer working group. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 103(22):1656–1664, 2011.
- Ihc color histograms for unsupervised ki67 proliferation index calculation. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 7:226, 2019.
- Pinet–an automated proliferation index calculator framework for ki67 breast cancer images. Cancers, 13(1):11, 2021.
- Domain adaptation for medical image analysis: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 69(3):1173–1185, Mar 2022. 10.1109/tbme.2021.3117407.
- Preserving dense features for Ki67 nuclei detection. In John E. Tomaszewski, Aaron D. Ward, and Richard M. Levenson M.D., editors, Medical Imaging 2022: Digital and Computational Pathology, volume 12039, page 120390Y. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, 2022. 10.1117/12.2611212.
- Learning with noisy labels. In C.J. Burges, L. Bottou, M. Welling, Z. Ghahramani, and K.Q. Weinberger, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 26. Curran Associates, Inc., 2013.
- Ki-67 as a prognostic biomarker in invasive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 113(7):808–819, 2021.
- A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 22(10):1345–1359, 2010. 10.1109/TKDE.2009.191.
- Ki-67 as a prognostic biomarker in invasive breast cancer. Pathology, 49(2):166–171, 2017.
- Prognostic value of different cut-off levels of ki-67 in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 64,196 patients. Breast cancer research and treatment, 153(3):477–491, 2015.
- A standardized investigational ki-67 immunohistochemistry assay used to assess high-risk early breast cancer patients in the monarche phase 3 clinical study identifies a population with greater risk of disease recurrence when treated with endocrine therapy alone. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol., 30(4):237–245, 2022.
- C. Senaras. Deepslides dataset. Zenodo, CERN: Meyrin, Switzerland, 2018.
- Global cancer statistics 2020: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal For Clinicians, 71(3):209–249, 2022.
- Laurens van der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton. Visualizing data using t-sne. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9(86):2579–2605, 2008.
- Breast cancer survival and stage at diagnosis in australia, canada, denmark, norway, sweden and the uk, 2000-2007: a population-based study. British Journal of Cancer, 108(5):1195–1208, 2013.
- Deep visual domain adaptation: A survey. Neurocomputing, 312:135–153, 2018. ISSN 0925-2312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.05.083.
- A survey of transfer learning. Journal of Big Data, 3(1), 2016. 10.1186/s40537-016-0043-6.
- Unsupervised domain adaptation with dual-scheme fusion network for medical image segmentation. In Christian Bessiere, editor, Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-20, pages 3291–3298. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 7 2020. 10.24963/ijcai.2020/455. Main track.
- Unsupervised domain adaptation for semantic segmentation via class-balanced self-training. In Vittorio Ferrari, Martial Hebert, Cristian Sminchisescu, and Yair Weiss, editors, Computer Vision – ECCV 2018, pages 297–313, Cham, 2018. Springer International Publishing.
Sponsored by Paperpile, the PDF & BibTeX manager trusted by top AI labs.
Get 30 days freePaper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.