Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
GPT-5.1
GPT-5.1 96 tok/s
Gemini 3.0 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash 159 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 203 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Effect of Intensity Standardization on Deep Learning for WML Segmentation in Multi-Centre FLAIR MRI (2307.03827v1)

Published 7 Jul 2023 in eess.IV, cs.AI, cs.CV, cs.LG, and eess.SP

Abstract: Deep learning (DL) methods for white matter lesion (WML) segmentation in MRI suffer a reduction in performance when applied on data from a scanner or centre that is out-of-distribution (OOD) from the training data. This is critical for translation and widescale adoption, since current models cannot be readily applied to data from new institutions. In this work, we evaluate several intensity standardization methods for MRI as a preprocessing step for WML segmentation in multi-centre Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) MRI. We evaluate a method specifically developed for FLAIR MRI called IAMLAB along with other popular normalization techniques such as White-strip, Nyul and Z-score. We proposed an Ensemble model that combines predictions from each of these models. A skip-connection UNet (SC UNet) was trained on the standardized images, as well as the original data and segmentation performance was evaluated over several dimensions. The training (in-distribution) data consists of a single study, of 60 volumes, and the test (OOD) data is 128 unseen volumes from three clinical cohorts. Results show IAMLAB and Ensemble provide higher WML segmentation performance compared to models from original data or other normalization methods. IAMLAB & Ensemble have the highest dice similarity coefficient (DSC) on the in-distribution data (0.78 & 0.80) and on clinical OOD data. DSC was significantly higher for IAMLAB compared to the original data (p<0.05) for all lesion categories (LL>25mL: 0.77 vs. 0.71; 10mL<= LL<25mL: 0.66 vs. 0.61; LL<10mL: 0.53 vs. 0.52). The IAMLAB and Ensemble normalization methods are mitigating MRI domain shift and are optimal for DL-based WML segmentation in unseen FLAIR data.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (40)
  1. Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative 2 clinical core: progress and plans. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 11(7):734–739, 2015.
  2. White matter hyperintensities in vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia (vcid): knowledge gaps and opportunities. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions, 5:107–117, 2019.
  3. Probabilistic segmentation of white matter lesions in mr imaging. NeuroImage, 21(3):1037–1044, 2004.
  4. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensities: an important imaging marker for cerebrovascular disease. American journal of neuroradiology, 32(10):1771–1775, 2011.
  5. Cerebrovascular pathology in alzheimer’s disease: Hopes and gaps. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 306:111184, 2020.
  6. Automatic detection of white matter hyperintensities in healthy aging and pathology using magnetic resonance imaging: a review. Neuroinformatics, 13(3):261–276, 2015.
  7. The comprehensive assessment of neurodegeneration and dementia: Canadian cohort study. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 46(5):499–511, 2019.
  8. White matter lesion extension to automatic brain tissue segmentation on mri. Neuroimage, 45(4):1151–1161, 2009.
  9. Performance of five research-domain automated wm lesion segmentation methods in a multi-center ms study. Neuroimage, 163:106–114, 2017.
  10. Stéphanie Debette and HS Markus. The clinical importance of white matter hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj, 341, 2010.
  11. Intracranial volume segmentation for neurodegenerative populations using multicentre flair mri. Neuroimage: Reports, 1(1):100006, 2021.
  12. The importance of skip connections in biomedical image segmentation. In Deep learning and data labeling for medical applications, pages 179–187. Springer, 2016.
  13. Pathologic correlates of incidental mri white matter signal hyperintensities. Neurology, 43(9):1683–1683, 1993.
  14. Characterization of white matter hyperintensities in large-scale mri-studies. Frontiers in Neurology, 10:238, 2019.
  15. Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia: a statement for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association. Stroke, 42(9):2672–2713, 2011.
  16. Performance of five automated white matter hyperintensity segmentation methods in a multicenter dataset. Scientific reports, 9(1):1–12, 2019.
  17. Stochastic neighbor embedding. Advances in neural information processing systems, 15:833–840, 2003.
  18. Robust white matter lesion segmentation in flair mri. IEEE Transactions on biomedical engineering, 59(3):860–871, 2011.
  19. Generalized method for partial volume estimation and tissue segmentation in cerebral magnetic resonance images. Journal of Medical Imaging, 1(1):014002, 2014.
  20. Segmentation of white matter lesions in multicentre flair mri. Neuroimage: Reports, 1(4):100044, 2021.
  21. Voxel-wise logistic regression and leave-one-source-out cross validation for white matter hyperintensity segmentation. Magnetic resonance imaging, 54:119–136, 2018.
  22. Standardized assessment of automatic segmentation of white matter hyperintensities and results of the wmh segmentation challenge. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 38(11):2556–2568, 2019.
  23. Computer-assisted segmentation of white matter lesions in 3d mr images using support vector machine. Academic radiology, 15(3):300–313, 2008.
  24. Fully convolutional network ensembles for white matter hyperintensities segmentation in mr images. NeuroImage, 183:650–665, 2018.
  25. Leukoaraiosis–new concepts and modern imaging. Polish journal of radiology, 83:e76, 2018.
  26. National neuroinformatics framework for canadian consortium on neurodegeneration in aging (ccna). Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 12:85, 2018.
  27. On standardizing the mr image intensity scale. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 42(6):1072–1081, 1999.
  28. Leonardo Pantoni. Cerebral small vessel disease: from pathogenesis and clinical characteristics to therapeutic challenges. The Lancet Neurology, 9(7):689–701, 2010.
  29. Pathogenesis of leukoaraiosis: a review. Stroke, 28(3):652–659, 1997.
  30. Pathology-preserving intensity standardization framework for multi-institutional flair mri datasets. Magnetic resonance imaging, 2019.
  31. Paul Schmidt. Bayesian inference for structured additive regression models for large-scale problems with applications to medical imaging. PhD thesis, lmu, 2017.
  32. Statistical normalization techniques for magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroImage Clinical, 6(1):9–19, 2014.
  33. Automatic segmentation of cerebral white matter hyperintensities using only 3d flair images. Magnetic resonance imaging, 31(7):1182–1189, 2013.
  34. Generalised dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentations. In Deep learning in medical image analysis and multimodal learning for clinical decision support, pages 240–248. Springer, 2017.
  35. Atherosclerosis imaging and the canadian atherosclerosis imaging network. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 29(3):297–303, 2013.
  36. Impact of white matter hyperintensities scoring method on correlations with clinical data: the ladis study. Stroke, 37(3):836–40, 2006.
  37. Comparison and validation of seven white matter hyperintensities segmentation software in elderly patients. NeuroImage: Clinical, 27:102357, 2020.
  38. Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration. The Lancet Neurology, 12(8):822–838, 2013.
  39. What are white matter hyperintensities made of? relevance to vascular cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Heart Association, 4(6):e001140, 2015.
  40. Skip connection u-net for white matter hyperintensities segmentation from mri. IEEE Access, 7:155194–155202, 2019.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 tweet and received 0 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: