Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 63 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 100 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 174 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 472 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Marginal Effects for Probit and Tobit with Endogeneity (2306.14862v4)

Published 26 Jun 2023 in econ.EM and stat.ME

Abstract: When evaluating partial effects, it is important to distinguish between structural endogeneity and measurement errors. In contrast to linear models, these two sources of endogeneity affect partial effects differently in nonlinear models. We study this issue focusing on the Instrumental Variable (IV) Probit and Tobit models. We show that even when a valid IV is available, failing to differentiate between the two types of endogeneity can lead to either under- or over-estimation of the partial effects. We develop simple estimators of the bounds on the partial effects and provide easy to implement confidence intervals that correctly account for both types of endogeneity. We illustrate the methods in a Monte Carlo simulation and an empirical application.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (18)
  1. Adusumilli, K. and T. Otsu (2018): “Nonparametric Instrumental Regression with Errors in Variables,” Econometric Theory, 34, 1256–1280.
  2. Blundell, R. and J. L. Powell (2003): “Endogeneity in Nonparametric and Semiparametric Regression Models,” in Advances in Economics and Econometrics, ed. by M. Dewatripont, L. P. Hansen, and S. J. Turnovsky, 312–357.
  3. Chesher, A. (2003): “Identification in Nonseparable Models,” Econometrica, 71, 1405–1441.
  4. Hahn, J. and G. Ridder (2017): “Instrumental variable estimation of nonlinear models with nonclassical measurement error using control variables,” Journal of Econometrics, 200, 238–250.
  5. Imbens, G. and W. Newey (2009): “Identification and Estimation of Triangular Simultaneous Equations Models without Additivity,” Econometrica, 77, 1481–1512.
  6. Kotlarski, I. (1967): “On Characterizing The Gamma And The Normal Distribution,” Pacific Journal Of Mathematics, 20, 69–76.
  7. Matzkin, R. L. (2013): “Nonparametric Identification in Structural Economic Models,” Annual Review of Economics, 5, 457–486.
  8. McCloskey, A. (2017): “Bonferroni-based size-correction for nonstandard testing problems,” Journal of Econometrics, 200, 17–35.
  9. Mroz, T. A. (1987): “The Sensitivity of an Empirical Model of Married Women’s Hours of Work to Economic and Statistical Assumptions,” Econometrica, 55, 765.
  10. Newey, W. K. (1987): “Efficient estimation of limited dependent variable models with endogenous explanatory variables,” Journal of Econometrics, 36, 231–250.
  11. Rivers, D. and Q. H. Vuong (1988): “Limited Information Estimators And Exogeneity Tests For Simultaneous Probit Models,” Journal of Econometrics, 39, 347–366.
  12. Romano, J. P. and M. Wolf (2005): “Stepwise Multiple Testing as Formalized Data Snooping,” Econometrica, 73, 1237–1282.
  13. Schennach, S. (2022): “Measurement Systems,” Journal of Economic Literature, 60, 1223–1263.
  14. Schennach, S., H. White, and K. Chalak (2012): “Local indirect least squares and average marginal effects in nonseparable structural systems,” Journal of Econometrics, 166, 282–302.
  15. Schennach, S. M. (2020): “Mismeasured and unobserved variables,” in Handbook of Econometrics, Elsevier, 487–565.
  16. Smith, R. J. and R. W. Blundell (1986): “An Exogeneity Test for a Simultaneous Equation Tobit Model with an Application to Labor Supply,” Econometrica, 54, 679.
  17. Song, S., S. M. Schennach, and H. White (2015): “Estimating nonseparable models with mismeasured endogenous variables,” Quantitative Economics, 6, 749–794.
  18. ——— (2015): “Control Function Methods in Applied Econometrics,” Journal of Human Resources, 50, 420–445.
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com