Improving City Life via Legitimate and Participatory Policy-making: A Data-driven Approach in Switzerland (2306.13696v1)
Abstract: This paper introduces a novel data-driven approach to address challenges faced by city policymakers concerning the distribution of public funds. Providing budgeting processes for improving quality of life based on objective (data-driven) evidence has been so far a missing element in policy-making. This paper focuses on a case study of 1,204 citizens in the city of Aarau, Switzerland, and analyzes survey data containing insightful indicators that can impact the legitimacy of decision-making. Our approach is twofold. On the one hand, we aim to optimize the legitimacy of policymakers' decisions by identifying the level of investment in neighborhoods and projects that offer the greatest return in legitimacy. To do so, we introduce a new context-independent legitimacy metric for policymakers. This metric allows us to distinguish decisive vs. indecisive collective preferences for neighborhoods or projects on which to invest, enabling policymakers to prioritize impactful bottom-up consultations and participatory initiatives (e.g., participatory budgeting). The metric also allows policymakers to identify the optimal number of investments in various project sectors and neighborhoods (in terms of legitimacy gain). On the other hand, we aim to offer guidance to policymakers concerning which satisfaction and participation factors influence citizens' quality of life through an accurate classification model and an evaluation of relocations. By doing so, policymakers may be able to further refine their strategy, making targeted investments with significant benefits to citizens' quality of life. These findings are expected to provide transformative insights for practicing direct democracy in Switzerland and a blueprint for policy-making to adopt worldwide.
- 2020. Euses Aarau Esuses Quartier. https://www.aarau.ch/leben/quartierentwicklung/quartierentwicklungskonzept.html/560
- Participatory budgeting as a form of dialogic accounting in Russia: Actors’ institutional work and reflexivity trap. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal (2018).
- Giovanni Allegretti and Sofia Antunes. 2014. The Lisbon Participatory Budget: results and perspectives on an experience in slow but continuous transformation. Field Actions Science Reports. The journal of field actions Special Issue 11 (2014).
- Saar Alon-Barkat and Sharon Gilad. 2016. Political control or legitimacy deficit? Bureaucracies’ symbolic responses to bottom-up public pressures. Policy & Politics 44, 1 (2016), 41 – 58. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557315X14443003393944
- Morten Skumsrud Andersen. 2012. Legitimacy in state-building: A review of the IR literature. International Political Sociology 6, 2 (2012), 205–219.
- Christian Bay. 1968. Needs, wants, and political legitimacy. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 1, 3 (1968), 241–260.
- Carla de Paiva Bezerra and Murilo de Oliveira Junqueira. 2022. Why has Participatory Budgeting Declined in Brazil? Brazilian Political Science Review 16 (2022).
- Allen Buchanan. 2002. Political legitimacy and democracy. Ethics 112, 4 (2002), 689–719.
- On cycling risk and discomfort: urban safety mapping and bike route recommendations. Computing 102 (2020), 1259–1274.
- SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of artificial intelligence research 16 (2002), 321–357.
- Johan Christensen. 2021. Expert knowledge and policymaking: a multi-disciplinary research agenda. Policy & Politics 49, 3 (2021), 455–471.
- Mengyao Cui et al. 2020. Introduction to the k-means clustering algorithm based on the elbow method. Accounting, Auditing and Finance 1, 1 (2020), 5–8.
- W. B. Gaille. 1955. Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1955).
- Kevin Gurney. 2018. An introduction to neural networks. CRC press.
- Anders Hanberger. 2003. Public policy and legitimacy: A historical policy analysis of the interplay of public policy and legitimacy. Policy Sciences 36, 3-4 (2003), 257–278.
- Human-centered democratic innovations with digital and participatory elements. In DG. O2021: The 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. 227–233.
- Democracy by Design: Perspectives for Digitally Assisted, Participatory Upgrades of Society. Participatory Upgrades of Society (November 2, 2022) (2022).
- Jennifer Hoewe and Cynthia Peacock. 2020. The power of media in shaping political attitudes. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 34 (2020), 19–24.
- Applied logistic regression. Vol. 398. John Wiley & Sons.
- Charles W Leonard. 2009. Confronting the State Budget and Establishing Quality-of-Life Benchmarks in Illinois: Results and Analysis of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute 2008 Statewide Poll. (2009).
- Gösta Ljungman. 2009. Top-Down Budgeting—An Instrument to Strengthen Budget Management. International Monetary Fund.
- Smart city and quality of life: Citizens’ perception in a Brazilian case study. Journal of Cleaner Production 182 (2018), 717–726.
- Increasing citizen participation in e-participatory budgeting processes. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 18, 2 (2021), 125–147.
- Michela Magliacani. 2020. The Public Value Sphere Within the Participatory Budgeting: Evidences From an Italian Smart City. Journal of US-China Public Administration 17, 3 (2020), 87–98.
- Decentralized cooperative scheduling of prosumer flexibility under forecast uncertainties. Applied Energy 290 (2021), 116706.
- Oleg N Medvedev and C Erik Landhuis. 2018. Exploring constructs of well-being, happiness and quality of life. PeerJ 6 (2018), e4903.
- David Meyer and FT Wien. 2015. Support vector machines. The Interface to libsvm in package 28 (2015), 20.
- Alfred Moore and Jack Stilgoe. 2009. Experts and anecdotes: The role of “anecdotal evidence”in public scientific controversies. Science, Technology, & Human Values 34, 5 (2009), 654–677.
- Eric A Morris. 2019. Do cities or suburbs offer higher quality of life? Intrametropolitan location, activity patterns, access, and subjective well-being. Cities 89 (2019), 228–242.
- Temporal self-regulation of energy demand. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 12, 3 (2016), 1196–1205.
- Fabienne Peter. 2017. Political Legitimacy (Summer 2017 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
- Proportional participatory budgeting with additive utilities. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (2021), 12726–12737.
- Participatory budgeting in North America: the case of Guelph, Canada. Journal of public budgeting, accounting & financial management (2009).
- Evangelos Pournaras. 2020. Proof of witness presence: Blockchain consensus for augmented democracy in smart cities. J. Parallel and Distrib. Comput. 145 (2020), 160–175.
- Crowd sensing and living lab outdoor experimentation made easy. IEEE Pervasive Computing 21, 1 (2021), 18–27.
- Perceived social support, quality of life and satisfaction with life in elderly people. Educational Gerontology 45, 1 (2019), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2019.1585065
- Vivien A. Schmidt. 2020. Conceptualizing Legitimacy: Input, Output, and Throughput. In Europe’s Crisis of Legitimacy: Governing by Rules and Ruling by Numbers in the Eurozone, Vivien A. Schmidt (Ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198797050.003.0002
- Participatory budgeting in Europe: Potentials and challenges. International journal of urban and regional research 32, 1 (2008), 164–178.
- Community quality-of-life indicators: Best cases II. Springer.
- Yan-Yan Song and LU Ying. 2015. Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction. Shanghai archives of psychiatry 27, 2 (2015), 130.
- Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals 11, 1 (2017), 451–478.
- Rachel Swaner. 2017. Trust matters: Enhancing government legitimacy through participatory budgeting. New Political Science 39, 1 (2017), 95–108.
- Aarau Study: Quality of Life, satisfaction and Legitimacy. (4 2023). https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22677385
- Cecilia Wong. 2001. The relationship between quality of life and local economic development: an empirical study of local authority areas in England. Cities 18, 1 (2001), 25–32.
Sponsor
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.