Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

LEO Clock Synchronization with Entangled Light (2305.19639v3)

Published 31 May 2023 in quant-ph

Abstract: Precision navigation and timing, very-long-baseline interferometry, next-generation communication, sensing, and tests of fundamental physics all require a highly synchronized network of clocks. With the advance of highly-accurate optical atomic clocks, the precision requirements for synchronization are reaching the limits of classical physics (i.e. the standard quantum limit, SQL). Efficiently overcoming the SQL to reach the fundamental Heisenberg limit can be achieved via the use of squeezed or entangled light. Although approaches to the Heisenberg limit are well understood in theory, a practical implementation, such as in space-based platforms, requires that the advantage outweighs the added costs and complexity. Here, we focus on the question: can entanglement yield a quantum advantage in clock synchronization over lossy satellite-to-satellite channels? We answer in the affirmative, showing that the redundancy afforded by the two-mode nature of entanglement allows recoverability even over asymmetrically lossy channels. We further show this recoverability is an improvement over single-mode squeezing sensing, thereby illustrating a new complexity-performance trade-off for space-based sensing applications.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (25)
  1. F. R. Giorgetta et al., “Optical two-way time and frequency transfer over free space,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 434–438, 2013.
  2. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, “Quantum-enhanced positioning and clock synchronization,” Nature, vol. 412, pp. 417–419, 2001.
  3. ——, “Quantum-enhanced measurements: beating the standard quantum limit,” Science, vol. 306, no. 5700, pp. 1330–1336, 2004.
  4. X. Guo et al., “Distributed quantum sensing in a continuous-variable entangled network,” Nat. Phys., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 281–284, 2020.
  5. Q. Zhuang, J. Preskill, and L. Jiang, “Distributed quantum sensing enhanced by continuous-variable error correction,” New Jour. of Phys., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2020.
  6. Z. Zhang and Q. Zhuang, “Distributed quantum sensing,” Quant. Sci. and Tech., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1–19, 2021.
  7. R. Gosalia et al., “Beyond the standard quantum limit in the synchronization of low-earth-orbit satellites,” IEEE Latincom, pp. 1–6, 2022.
  8. R. Jozsa, D. S. Abrams, J. P. Dowling, and C. P. Williams, “Quantum clock synchronization based on shared prior entanglement,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 85, pp. 2010–2013, 2000.
  9. E. O. Ilo-Okeke, L. Tessler, J. P. Dowling, and T. Byrnes, “Remote quantum clock synchronization without synchronized clocks,” npj Quantum Inf., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2018.
  10. J. Shi and S. Shen, “A clock synchronization method based on quantum entanglement,” Sci. Rep., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2022.
  11. F. Laudenbach et al., “Continuous-variable quantum key distribution with Gaussian modulation—the theory of practical implementations,” Adv. Quantum Technol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–37, 2018.
  12. N. Hosseinidehaj et al., “Satellite-based continuous-variable quantum communications: state-of-the-art and a predictive outlook,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 881–919, 2019.
  13. E. Villasenor et al., “Enhanced uplink quantum communication with satellites via downlink channels,” IEEE Trans. Quantum Eng., vol. 2, pp. 1–18, 2021.
  14. I. Ruo-Berchera et al., “One- and two-mode squeezed light in correlated interferometry,” Phys. Rev. A - At. Mol. Opt. Phys., vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 1–8, 2015.
  15. J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen et al., “Optical continuous-variable qubit,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 1–4, 2010.
  16. B. Lamine, C. Fabre, and N. Treps, “Quantum improvement of time transfer between remote clocks,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 101, no. 12, pp. 1–4, 2008.
  17. C. Fabre and N. Treps, “Modes and states in quantum optics,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 92, pp. 1–40, 2020.
  18. B. Brecht, D. V. Reddy, C. Silberhorn, and M. G. Raymer, “Photon temporal modes: A complete framework for quantum information science,” Phys. Rev. X, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1–17, 2015.
  19. M. G. Raymer and I. A. Walmsley, “Temporal modes in quantum optics: then and now,” Phys. Scr., vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 1–18, 2020.
  20. N. Treps et al., “Quantum noise in multipixel image processing,” Phys. Rev. A - At. Mol. Opt. Phys., vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2005.
  21. G. Patera, N. Treps, C. Fabre, and G. J. De Valcárcel, “Quantum theory of synchronously pumped type I optical parametric oscillators: characterization of the squeezed supermodes,” Eur. Phys. J. D, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 123–140, 2010.
  22. S. Jiang, N. Treps, and C. Fabre, “A time/frequency quantum analysis of the light generated by synchronously pumped optical parametric oscillators,” New J. Phys., vol. 14, pp. 1–16, 2012.
  23. S. Wang et al., “Sub-shot-noise interferometric timing measurement with a squeezed frequency comb,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 1–5, 2018.
  24. A. I. Lvovsky, “Squeezed light,” Photonics Sci. Found. Technol. Appl., vol. 1, pp. 121–163, 2015.
  25. R. W. Kingsbury, “Optical communications for small satellites,” Technology, no. 2015, pp. 1–127, 2015.
Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Whiteboard

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.