2000 character limit reached
Entanglement detection with classical deep neural networks (2304.05946v3)
Published 12 Apr 2023 in quant-ph
Abstract: In this study, we introduce an autonomous method for addressing the detection and classification of quantum entanglement, a core element of quantum mechanics that has yet to be fully understood. We employ a multi-layer perceptron to effectively identify entanglement in both two- and three-qubit systems. Our technique yields impressive detection results, achieving nearly perfect accuracy for two-qubit systems and over $90\%$ accuracy for three-qubit systems. Additionally, our approach successfully categorizes three-qubit entangled states into distinct groups with a success rate of up to $77\%$. These findings indicate the potential for our method to be applied to larger systems, paving the way for advancements in quantum information processing applications.
- Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev., 47(10):777–780, 1935.
- E. Schrödinger. Discussion of probability relations between separated systems. Math. Proc. Cam. Phil. Soc., 31:555, 1935.
- Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and einstein-podolsky-rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett., 70:1895, 1993.
- Advances in quantum teleportation. Nature Photonics, 9:641, 2015.
- Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states. Phys. Rev. A, 68:022312, 2003.
- Measurement-based quantum computation. Nature Physics, 5(19), 2009.
- Communication via one- and two-particle operators on einstein-podolsky-rosen states. Phys. Rev. Lett., 69:2881, 1992.
- Quantum entanglement. Rev. Modern Phys., 2009:865–942, 2009.
- O. Gühne and Géza Tóth. Entanglement detection. Phys. Rep., 474:1, 2009.
- J.S. Bell. On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics, 1:195–200, 1964.
- A. Peres. Separability criterion for density matrices. Phys. Rev. Lett., 77(8):1413–1415, 1996.
- Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions. Physics Letters A, 223(1-2):1 – 8, 1996.
- Reflections upon separability and distillability. J. Mod. Opt., 49:1399, 2002.
- Experimental detection of multipartite entanglement using witness operators. Phys. Rev. Lett., 92:087902, 2004.
- Separability criteria and entanglement measures for pure states of n identical fermions. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 86(2):20005 (6pp), 2009.
- Entropic entanglement criteria for continuous variables. Phys. Rev. Lett., 103:160505, 2009.
- Quantum-enhanced machine learning. Phys. Rev. Lett., 117:130501, 2016.
- V. Dunjko and H.J. Briegel. Machine learning and artificial intelligence in the quantum domain: a review of recent progress. Rep. Prog. Phys., 81:074001, 2018.
- The speed of quantum and classical learning for performing the k-th root of NOT. New J. Phys., 11:113018, 2009.
- Active learning machine learns to create new quantum experiments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 115:1221, 2017.
- Quantum neuron: an elementary building block for machine learning on quantum computers. ArXiv:1711.11240, 2017.
- Training deep quantum neural networks. Nat. Comm., 11:808, 2020.
- J. Torres and D. Manzano. A model of interacting quantum neurons with a dynamic synapse. New J. Physics, 24:073007, 2022.
- F. Rosenblatt. The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological Review, 65(6):386–408, 1958.
- M.L. Minsky. Perceptrons. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1969.
- Accuracy of entanglement detection via artificial neural networks and human-designed entanglement witnesses. Phys. Rev. App., 15(054006), 2021.
- Entanglement detection with artificial neural networks. Scientific Reports, 13:1562, 2023.
- Detecting quantum entanglement with unsupervised learning. Quantum Sci. Technol., 7:015005, 2022.
- Separability-entanglement classifier via machine learning. Phys. Rev. A, 98:012315, 2018.
- Experimental machine learning of quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett., 120:240501, 2018.
- N. Brunner A. Girardin and T. Krivachy. Building separable approximations for quantum states via neural networks. Phys. Rev. Res., 4:023238, 2022.
- W. Mcculloch and W. Pitts. A logical calculus of ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5:127, 1943.
- S.J. Russel and P. Norvig. Artificial intelligence - A modern approach. Second edition. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2003.
- V. Nair and G.E. Hinton. Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2010.
- Perceptron: Learning, generalization, model selection, fault tolerance, and role in the deep learning era. Mathematics, 10:4730, 2022.
- P.K. Diederik and J. Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference for Learning Representations, 2015.
- M. Riedmiller and H. Braun. A direct adaptive method for faster backpropagation learning: The rprop algorithm. In IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, 1993.
- X. Glorot and Y. Bengio. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, volume 9, page 249, 2010.
- Volume of the set of separable states. Phys. Rev. A, 58:883, 1998.
- Reinhard F. Werner. Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model. Phys. Rev. A, 40(8):4277–4281, 1989.
- Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory, and Conceptions of the Universe, page 69. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 1989.
- Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways. Phys. Rev. A, 62:062314, 2000.
- Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.
