Using the inductive-energy participation ratio to characterize a superconducting quantum chip (2303.18220v2)
Abstract: We developed an inductive energy participation ratio (IEPR) method and a streamlined procedure for simulating and verifying superconducting quantum chips. These advancements are increasingly vital in the context of large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computing. Our approach efficiently extracts the key linear and nonlinear characteristic parameters, as well as the Hamiltonian of a quantum chip layout. In theory, the IEPR method provides insights into the relationship between energy distribution and representation transformation. We demonstrate its practicality by applying it to quantum chip layouts, efficiently obtaining crucial characteristic parameters in both bare and normal representations-an endeavor that challenges existing methods. Our work holds the promise of significant enhancements in simulation and verification techniques and represents a pivotal step towards quantum electronic design automation.
- J. Chow, O. Dial, and J. Gambetta, IBM quantum breaks the 100-qubit processor barrier, IBM Research Blog (2021).
- R. Alt, On the potentials of quantum computing–an interview with heike riel from ibm research, Electronic Markets 32, 2537 (2022).
- K. Ikeda, First realization of quantum energy teleportation on quantum hardware, arXiv:2301.02666 (2023).
- Note that (near) resonant coupling regime represents the coupling strength between elements is much larger than the frequency detuning, while dispersive regime means the coupling strength between elements is much smaller than the frequency detuning.
- The bare hamiltonian can be diagonalized to yield the unique normal hamiltonian. in contrast, attempting to derive the bare hamiltonian from the unique inverse transformation of the normal hamiltonian proves unfeasible.
- A. Blais, S. M. Girvin, and W. D. Oliver, Quantum information processing and quantum optics with circuit quantum electrodynamics, Nature Physics 16, 247 (2020).
- B. Yurke and J. S. Denker, Quantum network theory, Physical Review A 29, 1419 (1984).
- G. Burkard, R. H. Koch, and D. P. DiVincenzo, Multilevel quantum description of decoherence in superconducting qubits, Physical Review B 69, 064503 (2004).
- M. Malekakhlagh, A. Petrescu, and H. E. Türeci, Cutoff-free circuit quantum electrodynamics, Physical Review Letters 119, 073601 (2017).
- M. F. Gely and G. A. Steele, Qucat: quantum circuit analyzer tool in python, New Journal of Physics 22, 013025 (2020).
- F. Solgun, D. W. Abraham, and D. P. DiVincenzo, Blackbox quantization of superconducting circuits using exact impedance synthesis, Physical Review B 90, 134504 (2014).
- D. Dubyna and W. Kuo, Inter-qubit interaction mediated by collective modes in a linear array of three-dimensional cavities, Quantum Science and Technology 5, 035002 (2020).
- J. Hornibrook, E. Mitchell, and D. Reilly, Superconducting resonators with parasitic electromagnetic environments, arXiv:1203.4442 (2012).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.