Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 65 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 113 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 200 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 445 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 34 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Strong pinning transition with arbitrary defect potentials (2301.02254v1)

Published 5 Jan 2023 in cond-mat.supr-con and cond-mat.soft

Abstract: Dissipation-free current transport in type II superconductors requires vortices to be pinned by defects in the underlying material. The pinning capacity of a defect is quantified by the Labusch parameter $\kappa \sim f_p/\xi\bar{C}$, measuring the pinning force $f_p$ relative to the elasticity $\bar{C}$ of the vortex lattice, with $\xi$ denoting the coherence length (or vortex core size) of the superconductor. The critical value $\kappa = 1$ separates weak from strong pinning, with a strong defect at $\kappa > 1$ able to pin a vortex on its own. So far, this weak-to-strong pinning transition has been studied for isotropic defect potentials, resulting in a critical exponent $\mu = 2$ for the onset of the strong pinning force density $F_\mathrm{pin} \sim n_p f_p (\xi/a_0)2(\kappa-1)\mu$, with $n_ p$ denoting the density of defects and $a_0$ the intervortex distance. The behavior changes dramatically when studying anisotropic defects with no special symmetries: the strong pinning then originates out of isolated points with length scales growing as $\xi (\kappa - 1){1/2}$, resulting in a different force exponent $\mu = 5/2$. Our analysis of the strong pinning onset for arbitrary defect potentials $e_p(\mathbf{R})$, with $\mathbf{R}$ a planar coordinate, makes heavy use of the Hessian matrix describing its curvature and leads us to interesting geometrical structures. Both, onset and merger points are defined by local differential properties of the Hessian's determinant $D(\mathbf{R})$, specifically, its minima and saddle points. Extending our analysis to the case of a random two-dimensional pinning landscape, we discuss the topological properties of unstable and bistable regions as expressed through the Euler characteristic, with the latter related to the local differential properties of $D(\mathbf{R})$ through Morse theory.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.