Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 148 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 34 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 183 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 443 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 35 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A tau-leaping method for computing joint probability distributions of the first-passage time and position of a Brownian particle (2301.00647v1)

Published 2 Jan 2023 in q-bio.MN and cond-mat.soft

Abstract: First passage time (FPT) is the time a particle, subject to some stochastic process, hits or crosses a closed surface for the very first time. $\tau$-leaping methods are a class of stochastic algorithms in which, instead of simulating every single reaction, many reactions are ``leaped" over in order to shorten the computing time. In this paper we developed a $\tau$-leaping method for computing the FPT and position in arbitrary volumes for a Brownian particle governed by the Langevin equation. The $\tau$-leaping method proposed here works as follows. A sphere is inscribed within the volume of interest (VOI) centered at the initial particle's location. On this sphere, the FPT is sampled, as well as the position, which becomes the new initial position. Then, another sphere, centered at this new location, is inscribed. This process continues until the sphere becomes smaller than some minimal radius $R_{\text{min}}$. When this occurs, the $\tau$-leaping switches to the conventional Monte Carlo, which runs until the particle either crosses the surface of the VOI or finds its way to a position where a sphere of radius $>R_{\text{min}}$ can be inscribed. The switching between $\tau$-leaping and MC continues until the particle crosses the surface of the VOI. The size of this radius depends on the system parameters and on one's notion of accuracy: the larger this radius the more accurate the $\tau$-leaping method, but also less efficient. This trade off between accuracy and efficiency is discussed. For two VOI, the $\tau$-leaping method is shown to be accurate and more efficient than MC by at least a factor of 10 and up to a factor of about 110. However, while MC becomes exponentially slower with increasing VOI, the efficiency of the $\tau$-leaping method remains relatively unchanged. Thus, the $\tau$-leaping method can potentially be many orders of magnitude more efficient than MC.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.