Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 99 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 190 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 425 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Subadditive Average Distances and Quantum Promptness (2212.06156v2)

Published 12 Dec 2022 in hep-th and gr-qc

Abstract: A central property of a classical geometry is that the geodesic distance between two events is \emph{additive}. When considering quantum fluctuations in the metric or a quantum or statistical superposition of different spacetimes, additivity is generically lost at the level of expectation values. In the presence of a superposition of metrics, distances can be made diffeomorphism invariant by considering the frame of a family of free-falling observers or a pressureless fluid, provided we work at sufficiently low energies. We propose to use the average squared distance between two events $\langle d2(x,y)\rangle$ as a proxy for understanding the effective quantum (or statistical) geometry and the emergent causal relations among such observers. At each point, the average squared distance $\langle d2(x,y)\rangle$ defines an average metric tensor. However, due to non-additivity, $\langle d2(x,y)\rangle$ is not the (squared) geodesic distance associated with it. We show that departures from additivity can be conveniently captured by a bi-local quantity $C(x,y)$. Violations of additivity build up with the mutual separation between $x$ and $y$ and can correspond to $C<0$ (subadditive) or $C>0$ (superadditive). We show that average Euclidean distances are always subadditive: they satisfy the triangle inequality but generally fail to saturate it. In Lorentzian signature there is no definite result about the sign of $C$, most physical examples give $C<0$ but there exist counterexamples. The causality induced by subadditive Lorentzian distances is unorthodox but not pathological. Superadditivity violates the transitivity of causal relations. On these bases, we argue that subadditive distances are the expected outcome of dynamical evolution, if relatively generic physical initial conditions are considered.

Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.