Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 178 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 38 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 73 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 231 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 427 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Spin-state Gaps and Self-Interaction-Corrected Density Functional Approximations: Octahedral Fe(II) Complexes as Case Study (2211.03935v1)

Published 8 Nov 2022 in physics.chem-ph

Abstract: Accurate prediction of spin-state energy difference is crucial for understanding the spin crossover (SCO) phenomena and is very challenging for the density functional approximations, especially for the local and semi-local approximations, due to delocalization errors. Here, we investigate the effect of self-interaction error removal from the local spin density approximation (LSDA) and PBE generalized gradient approximation (GGA) on the spin-state gaps of Fe(II) complexes with various ligands using recently developed locally scaled self-interaction correction (LSIC) by Zope et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 151, 214108 (2019)]. The LSIC method is exact for one-electron density, which recovers uniform electron gas limit of underlying functional and approaches the well-known Perdew-Zunger self-interaction correction Phys. Rev. B, 23, 5048 (1981) as a special case when the scaling factor is constant. Our results, when compared with reference diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) results, show that the PZSIC method significantly overestimates spin-state gaps favoring low spin states for all ligands and does not improve upon DFAs. The perturbative LSIC-LSDA using PZSIC densities significantly improves the gaps with a mean absolute error of 0.51 eV but slightly overcorrects for the stronger CO ligands. The quasi-self-consistent LSIC-LSDA, like CCSD(T), gives a correct sign of spin-state gaps for all ligands with MAE of 0.56 eV, comparable to that of CCSD(T) (0.49 eV).

Citations (8)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.