Counterexamples to the Gaussian vs. MZ derivatives Conjecture (2209.04095v2)

Abstract: J. Marcinkiewicz and A. Zygmund proved in 1936 that the special $n$-th generalized Riemann derivative ${2}D_nf(x)$ with nodes $0,1,2,2^2,\ldots, 2^{n-1}$, is equivalent to the $n$-th Peano derivative $f{(n)}(x)$, for all $n-1$ times Peano differentiable functions $f$ at~$x$. Call every $n$-th generalized Riemann derivative with this property an MZ derivative. The paper Ash, Catoiu, and Fejzi\'c [Israel J. Math. {255} (2023):177--199] introduced the $n$-th Gaussian derivatives as the $n$-th generalized Riemann derivatives with nodes either $0,1,q,q^2,\ldots ,q^{n-1}$ or $1,q,q^2,\ldots ,q^{n}$, where~$q\neq0,\pm 1$, proved that the Gaussian derivatives are MZ derivatives, and conjectured that these are \emph{all} MZ derivatives. In this article, we invalidate this conjecture by means of two counterexamples. The order in which these are presented allows an update of the conjecture after each counterexample. The proof of the first counterexample is simple, by scales of generalized Riemann derivatives. The proof of the second involves the classification of generalized Riemann derivatives of Ash, Catoiu, and Chin [Proc. Amer. Math. Soc {146} (2018):3847--3862]. Symmetric versions of all the results are also~included.