Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 70 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 75 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 175 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 447 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro
2000 character limit reached

Two Pointwise Characterizations of the Peano Derivative (2209.04088v2)

Published 9 Sep 2022 in math.CA

Abstract: We provide the first two examples of sets of generalized Riemann derivatives of orders up to $n$, $n\geq 2$, whose simultaneous existence for all functions~$f$ at~$x$ is equivalent to the existence of the $n$-th Peano derivative $f_{(n)}(x)$. In this way, we begin to understand how the theory of Peano derivatives can be explained exclusively in terms of generalized Riemann derivatives, a bold new principle in generalized differentiation. In 1936, J. Marcinkiewicz and A. Zygmund showed that the existence of $f_{(n)}(x)$ is equivalent to the existence of both $f_{(n-1)}(x)$ and the $n$th generalized Riemann derivative $\widetilde{D}nf(x)$, based at $x,x+h,x+2h,x+22h,\ldots ,x+2{n-1}h$. Our first characterization of $f{(n)}(x)$ is that its existence is equivalent to the simultaneous existence of $\widetilde{D}1f(x),\ldots,\widetilde{D}_nf(x)$. Our second characterization is that the existence of $f{(n)}(x)$ is equivalent to the existence of $\widetilde{D}1f(x)$ and of all $n(n-1)/2$ forward shifts, [ D{k,j}f(x)=\lim_{h\rightarrow 0} h{-k}\sum_{i=0}k(-1)i\binom ki f(x+(k+j-i)h), ] for $j=0,1,\ldots,k-2$, of the $k$-th Riemann derivatives $D_{k,0}f(x)$, for $k=2,\ldots ,n$. The proof of the second result involves an interesting combinatorial algorithm that starts with consecutive forward shifts of an arithmetic progression and yields a geometric progression, using two set-operations: dilation and combinatorial Gaussian elimination. This result proves a variant of a 1998 conjecture by Ginchev, Guerragio and Rocca, predicting the same outcome for backward shifts instead of forward shifts. The conjecture has been recently settled in [5], with a proof that has this variant's proof as a prerequisite.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.