Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Comparative statics with adjustment costs and the Le Chatelier principle

Published 1 Jun 2022 in econ.TH | (2206.00347v5)

Abstract: We develop a theory of monotone comparative statics for models with adjustment costs. We show that comparative-statics conclusions may be drawn under the usual ordinal complementarity assumptions on the objective function, assuming very little about costs: only a mild monotonicity condition is required. We use this insight to prove a general Le Chatelier principle: under the ordinal complementarity assumptions, if short-run adjustment is subject to a monotone cost, then the long-run response to a shock is greater than the short-run response. We extend these results to a fully dynamic model of adjustment over time: the Le Chatelier principle remains valid, and under slightly stronger assumptions, optimal adjustment follows a monotone path. We apply our results to models of saving, production, pricing, labor supply and investment.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (37)
  1. “Monopoly theory with price-increase aversion”, in progress
  2. Rüdiger Bachmann, Ricardo J. Caballero and Eduardo M.R.A. Engel “Aggregate implications of lumpy investment” In American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 5.4, 2013, pp. 29–67 DOI: 10.1257/mac.5.4.29
  3. Kerry Back “Insider trading in continuous time” In Review of Financial Studies 5.3, 1992, pp. 387–409 DOI: 10.1093/rfs/5.3.387
  4. “Asset-based microfinance for microenterprises” In American Economic Review 114.2, 2024, pp. 534–74 DOI: 10.1257/aer.20210169
  5. Roland Bénabou “The economics of motivated beliefs” In Revue d’économie politique 125.5, 2015, pp. 665–685 DOI: 10.3917/redp.255.0665
  6. “Mindful economics” In Journal of Economic Perspectives 30.3, 2016, pp. 141–164 DOI: 10.1257/jep.30.3.141
  7. “Firing costs and labour demand” In Review of Economic Studies 57.3, 1990, pp. 381–402 DOI: 10.2307/2298020
  8. “Consumption dynamics during recessions” In Econometrica 83.1, 2015, pp. 101–154 DOI: 10.3982/ECTA11254
  9. “Wishful thinking” NBER working paper 25707, 2019 DOI: 10.3386/w25707
  10. Andrew Caplin and Daniel F. Spulber “Menu costs and the neutrality of money” In Quarterly Journal of Economics 102.4, 1987, pp. 703–725 DOI: 10.2307/1884277
  11. Raj Chetty “Bounds on elasticities with optimization frictions” In Econometrica 80.3, 2012, pp. 969–1018 DOI: 10.3982/ECTA9043
  12. “Adjustment costs, firm responses, and micro vs. macro labor supply elasticities” In Quarterly Journal of Economics 126.2, 2011, pp. 749–804 DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjr013
  13. “Consumption commitments and habit formation” In Econometrica 84.2, 2016, pp. 855–890 DOI: 10.3982/ECTA9390
  14. Russell W. Cooper and John C. Haltiwanger “On the nature of capital adjustment costs” In Review of Economic Studies 73.3, 2006, pp. 611–633 DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2006.00389.x
  15. Paweł Dziewulski and John K.-H. Quah “Comparative statics with linear objectives” In Econometrica 92.1, 2024, pp. 167–200 DOI: 10.3982/ECTA19738
  16. “Does the classic microfinance model discourage entrepreneurship among the poor?” In Journal of Political Economy 103.6, 2013, pp. 2196–2226 DOI: 10.1257/aer.103.6.2196
  17. Jordi Galí “Monetary policy, inflation, and the business cycle” Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015
  18. Mikhail Golosov and Robert E. Lucas “Menu costs and Phillips curves” In Journal of Political Economy 115.2, 2007, pp. 171–199 DOI: 10.1086/512625
  19. Sanford J. Grossman and Guy Laroque “Asset pricing and optimal portfolio choice in the presence of illiquid durable consumption goods” In Econometrica 58.1, 1990, pp. 25–51 DOI: 10.2307/2938333
  20. Daniel S. Hamermesh “Labor demand and the structure of adjustment costs” NBER working paper 2572, 1988 DOI: 10.3386/w2572
  21. Fumio Hayashi “Tobin’s marginal q𝑞qitalic_q and average q𝑞qitalic_q” In Econometrica 50.1, 1982, pp. 213–224 DOI: 10.2307/1912538
  22. Hugo A. Hopenhayn and Edward C. Prescott “Stochastic monotonicity and stationary distributions for dynamic economies” In Econometrica 60.6, 1992, pp. 1387–1406 DOI: 10.2307/2951526
  23. Dale W. Jorgenson “Capital theory and investment behavior” In American Economic Review 53.2, 1963, pp. 247–259
  24. Greg Kaplan and Giovanni L. Violante “A model of the consumption response to fiscal stimulus payments” In Econometrica 82.4, 2014, pp. 1199–1239 DOI: 10.3982/ECTA10528
  25. Albert S. Kyle “Continuous auctions and insider trading” In Econometrica 53.6, 1985, pp. 1315–1335 DOI: 10.2307/1913210
  26. “The magnitude of menu costs” In Quarterly Journal of Economics 112.3, 1997, pp. 791–824 DOI: 10.1162/003355397555352
  27. N.Gregory Mankiw “Small menu costs and large business cycles” In Quarterly Journal of Economics 100.2, 1985, pp. 529–538 DOI: 10.2307/1885395
  28. Virgiliu Midrigan “Menu costs, multiproduct firms, and aggregate fluctuations” In Econometrica 79.4, 2011, pp. 1139–1180 DOI: 10.3982/ECTA6735
  29. “Rationalizability, learning, and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities” In Econometrica 58.6, 1990, pp. 1255–1277 DOI: 10.2307/2938316
  30. “The LeChatelier principle” In American Economic Review 86.1, 1996, pp. 173–179 JSTOR: 2118261
  31. “Monotone comparative statics” In Econometrica 62.1, 1994, pp. 157–180 DOI: 10.2307/2951479
  32. Julio J. Rotemberg “Monopolistic price adjustment and aggregate output” In Review of Economic Studies 49.4, 1982, pp. 517–531 DOI: 10.2307/2297284
  33. Paul A. Samuelson “Foundations of economic analysis” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1947
  34. Julia K. Thomas “Is lumpy investment relevant for the business cycle?” In Journal of Political Economy 110.3, 2002, pp. 508–534 DOI: 10.1086/339746
  35. James Tobin “A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory” In Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 1.1, 1969, pp. 15–29 DOI: 10.2307/1991374
  36. Donald M. Topkis “Supermodularity and complementarity” Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998
  37. Thomas Winberry “Lumpy investment, business cycles, and stimulus policy” In American Economic Review 111.1, 2021, pp. 364–396 DOI: 10.1257/aer.20161723

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Whiteboard

Paper to Video (Beta)

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.