2000 character limit reached
Approximating Choice Data by Discrete Choice Models (2205.01882v4)
Published 4 May 2022 in econ.TH and econ.EM
Abstract: We obtain a necessary and sufficient condition under which random-coefficient discrete choice models, such as mixed-logit models, are rich enough to approximate any nonparametric random utility models arbitrarily well across choice sets. The condition turns out to be the affine-independence of the set of characteristic vectors. When the condition fails, resulting in some random utility models that cannot be closely approximated, we identify preferences and substitution patterns that are challenging to approximate accurately. We also propose algorithms to quantify the magnitude of approximation errors.
- Agranov, M. and P. Ortoleva (2017): “Stochastic choice and preferences for randomization,” Journal of Political Economy, 125, 40–68.
- Allen, R. and J. Rehbeck (2020): “Hicksian Complementarity and Perturbed Utility Models,” Economic Theory Bulletin, 8, 245–261.
- Allenby, G. M., N. Hardt, and P. E. Rossi (2019): “Economic Foundations of Conjoint Analysis,” in Handbook of the Economics of Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 1, 151–192.
- Athey, S. and G. W. Imbens (2007): “Discrete Choice Models with Multiple Unobserved Choice Characteristics,” International Economic Review, 48, 1159–1192.
- Barron, A. R., A. Cohen, W. Dahmen, and R. A. DeVore (2008): “Approximation and Learning by Greedy Algorithms,” Annals of Statistics, 36, 64–94.
- Berry, S., J. Levinsohn, and A. Pakes (1995): “Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium,” Econometrica, 841–890.
- Berry, S. T. (1994): “Estimating Discrete-choice Models of Product Differentiation,” RAND Journal of Economics, 242–262.
- Berry, S. T. and P. A. Haile (2014): “Identification in Differentiated Products Markets Using Market Level Data,” Econometrica, 82, 1749–1797.
- ——— (2021): “Foundations of Demand Estimation,” in Handbook of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), 1–62.
- Block, H. D. and J. Marschak (1960): “Random Orderings and Stochastic Theories of Responses,” Contributions to Probability and Statistics, 2, 97–132.
- Chen, X. (2007): “Large Sample Sieve Estimation of Semi-nonparametric Models,” Handbook of Econometrics, 6, 5549–5632.
- Compiani, G. (2022): “Market Counterfactuals and the Specification of Multiproduct Demand: A Nonparametric Approach,” Quantitative Economics, 13, 545–591.
- Conlon, C. and J. H. Mortimer (2021): “Empirical Properties of Diversion Ratios,” RAND Journal of Economics, 52, 693–726.
- Croissant, Y. (2020): “Estimation of Random Utility Models in R: The mlogit Package,” Journal of Statistical Software, 95, 1–41.
- Dagsvik, J. K. (1994): “Discrete and Continuous Choice, Max-Stable Processes, and Independence from Irrelevant Attributes,” Econometrica, 1179–1205.
- Dempster, A. P., N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin (1977): “Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 39, 1–22.
- Doignon, J.-P. and K. Saito (2023): “Adjacencies on Random Ordering Polytopes and Flow Polytopes,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 114, 102768.
- Frick, M., R. Iijima, and T. Strzalecki (2019): “Dynamic Random Utility,” Econometrica, 87, 1941–2002.
- Herriges, J. A. and C. L. Kling (1999): “Nonlinear Income Effects in Random Utility Models,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 81, 62–72.
- Horan, S. and A. Adam (2023): “Slutsky Patterns of Substitution in Discrete Choice,” Working Paper.
- Lu, J. and K. Saito (2021): “Mixed Logit and Pure Characteristic Models,” Working Paper.
- McFadden, D. and K. Train (2000): “Mixed MNL Models for Discrete Response,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 447–470.
- Tebaldi, P., A. Torgovitsky, and H. Yang (2023): “Nonparametric Estimates of Demand in the California Health Insurance Exchange,” Econometrica, 91, 107–146.
- Thomson, C. J. and S. J. Crooke (1991): “Results of the Southern California Sportfish Economic Survey,” NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS.
- Ye, Y. (1987): “Interior Algorithms for Linear, Quadratic, and Linearly Constrained Non-Linear Programming,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of ESS, Stanford University.
Sponsor
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.