Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 38 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 200 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 438 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Zeta-Payne: a fully automated spectrum analysis algorithm for the Milky Way Mapper program of the SDSS-V survey (2203.14538v1)

Published 28 Mar 2022 in astro-ph.IM

Abstract: The Sloan Digital Sky Survey has recently initiated its 5th survey generation (SDSS-V), with a central focus on stellar spectroscopy. In particular, SDSS-V Milky Way Mapper program will deliver multi-epoch optical and near-infrared spectra for more than 5 million stars across the entire sky, covering a large range in stellar mass, surface temperature, evolutionary stage, and age. About 10% of those spectra will be of hot stars of OBAF spectral types, for whose analysis no established survey pipelines exist. Here we present the spectral analysis algorithm, Zeta-Payne, developed specifically to obtain stellar labels from SDSS-V spectra of stars with these spectral types and drawing on machine learning tools. We provide details of the algorithm training, its test on artificial spectra, and its validation on two control samples of real stars. Analysis with Zeta-Payne leads to only modest internal uncertainties in the near-IR with APOGEE (optical with BOSS): 3-10% (1-2%) for Teff, 5-30% (5-25%) for v*sin(i), 1.7-6.3 km/s(0.7-2.2 km/s) for RV, $<0.1$ dex ($<0.05$ dex) for log(g), and 0.4-0.5 dex (0.1 dex) for [M/H] of the star, respectively. We find a good agreement between atmospheric parameters of OBAF-type stars when inferred from their high- and low-resolution optical spectra. For most stellar labels the APOGEE spectra are (far) less informative than the BOSS spectra of these stars, while log(g), v*sin(i), and [M/H] are in most cases too uncertain for meaningful astrophysical interpretation. This makes BOSS low-resolution optical spectra better for stellar labels of OBAF-type stars, unless the latter are subject to high levels of extinction.

Citations (6)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.