Resistance distance in connected balanced digraphs (2201.11405v5)
Abstract: Let $D = (V, E)$ be a strongly connected and balanced digraph with vertex set $V$ and arc set $E.$ The classical distance $d_{ij}D$ from $i$ to $j$ in $D$ is the length of a shortest directed path from $i$ to $j$ in $D.$ Let $L$ be the Laplacian matrix of $D$ and $ L{\dagger} = ( l_{ij}{\dagger} )$ be the Moore-Penrose inverse of $L.$ The resistance distance from $i$ to $j$ is then defined by $r_{ij}D := l_{ii}{\dagger } + l_{jj}{\dagger } - 2 l_{ij}{\dagger }.$ Let ${ D_1, D_2, ...., D_k }$ be a sequence of strongly connected balanced digraphs with $D_i \cap D_j$ having at most one vertex in common for all $i \neq j$ and with $r_{ij}{D_t} \leq d_{ij}{D_t} \ \forall \ t = 1 \ \mathrm{to} \ k.$ Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a collection of connected, balanced digraphs, each member of which is a finite union of the form $D_1 \cup D_2 \cup ....\cup D_k$ where each $D_i$ is a connected and balanced digraph with $D_{i} \cap ( D_1 \cup D_2 \cup ....\cup D_{i-1} )$ being a single vertex, for all $i,$ $1 < i \leq k.$ In this paper, we show that for any digraph $D$ in $\mathcal{C}$, $r_{ij}D \leq d_{ij}D \ ()$. This is established by partitioning the Laplacian matrix of $D$. This generalizes the main result in [3]. As a corollary, we deduce a simpler proof of the result in [3], namely, that for any directed cactus $D$, the inequality () holds. Our results provide an affirmative answer to a well known interesting conjecture ( cf : Conjecture 1.3 ).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.