Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 79 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 60 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 117 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 201 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 466 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

FlowPool: Pooling Graph Representations with Wasserstein Gradient Flows (2112.09990v2)

Published 18 Dec 2021 in cs.LG

Abstract: In several machine learning tasks for graph structured data, the graphs under consideration may be composed of a varying number of nodes. Therefore, it is necessary to design pooling methods that aggregate the graph representations of varying size to representations of fixed size which can be used in downstream tasks, such as graph classification. Existing graph pooling methods offer no guarantee with regards to the similarity of a graph representation and its pooled version. In this work, we address this limitation by proposing FlowPool, a pooling method that optimally preserves the statistics of a graph representation to its pooled counterpart by minimising their Wasserstein distance. This is achieved by performing a Wasserstein gradient flow with respect to the pooled graph representation. Our method relies on a versatile implementation which can take into account the geometry of the representation space through any ground cost and computes the gradient of the Wasserstein distance with automatic differentiation. We propose the differentiation of the Wasserstein flow layer using an implicit differentiation scheme. Therefore, our pooling method is amenable to automatic differentiation and can be integrated in end-to-end deep learning architectures. Further, FlowPool is invariant to permutations and can therefore be combined with permutation equivariant feature extraction layers in GNNs in order to obtain predictions that are independent of the ordering of the nodes. Experimental results demonstrate that our method leads to an increase in performance compared to existing pooling methods when evaluated on graph classification.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.