Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 77 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 175 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 454 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

KMT-2018-BLG-1743: Planetary Microlensing Event Occurring on Two Source Stars (2107.00155v1)

Published 1 Jul 2021 in astro-ph.EP, astro-ph.GA, and astro-ph.SR

Abstract: We present the analysis of the microlensing event KMT-2018-BLG-1743. The light curve of the event, with a peak magnification $A_{\rm peak}\sim 800$, exhibits two anomaly features, one around the peak and the other on the falling side of the light curve. An interpretation with a binary lens and a single source (2L1S) cannot describe the anomalies. By conducting additional modeling that includes an extra lens (3L1S) or an extra source (2L2S) relative to a 2L1S interpretation, we find that 2L2S interpretations with a planetary lens system and a binary source best explain the observed light curve with $\Delta\chi2\sim 188$ and $\sim 91$ over the 2L1S and 3L1S solutions, respectively. Assuming that these $\Delta\chi2$ values are adequate for distinguishing the models, the event is the fourth 2L2S event and the second 2L2S planetary event. The 2L2S interpretations are subject to a degeneracy, resulting in two solutions with $s>1.0$ (wide solution) and $s<1.0$ (close solution). The masses of the lens components and the distance to the lens are $(M_{\rm host}/M_\odot, M_{\rm planet}/M_{\rm J}, D_{\rm L}/{\rm kpc}) \sim (0.19{+0.27}_{-0.111}, 0.25{+0.34}_{-0.14}, 6.48{+0.94}_{-1.03})$ and $\sim (0.42{+0.34}_{-0.25}, 1.61{+1.30}_{-0.97}, 6.04{+0.93}_{-1.27})$ according to the wide and close solutions, respectively. The source is a binary composed of an early G dwarf and a mid M dwarf. The values of the relative lens-source proper motion expected from the two degenerate solutions, $\mu_{\rm wide}\sim 2.3 $mas yr${-1}$ and $\mu_{\rm close} \sim 4.1 $mas yr${-1}$, are substantially different, and thus the degeneracy can be broken by resolving the lens and source from future high-resolution imaging observations.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.