Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 95 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 46 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 90 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 449 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 192 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Convolutional Dynamic Alignment Networks for Interpretable Classifications (2104.00032v2)

Published 31 Mar 2021 in cs.LG

Abstract: We introduce a new family of neural network models called Convolutional Dynamic Alignment Networks (CoDA-Nets), which are performant classifiers with a high degree of inherent interpretability. Their core building blocks are Dynamic Alignment Units (DAUs), which linearly transform their input with weight vectors that dynamically align with task-relevant patterns. As a result, CoDA-Nets model the classification prediction through a series of input-dependent linear transformations, allowing for linear decomposition of the output into individual input contributions. Given the alignment of the DAUs, the resulting contribution maps align with discriminative input patterns. These model-inherent decompositions are of high visual quality and outperform existing attribution methods under quantitative metrics. Further, CoDA-Nets constitute performant classifiers, achieving on par results to ResNet and VGG models on e.g. CIFAR-10 and TinyImagenet.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (40)
  1. Sanity Checks for Saliency Maps. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2018.
  2. Improved inception-residual convolutional neural network for object recognition. Neural Computing and Applications, 2020.
  3. Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing (NeurIPS), 2018.
  4. On Pixel-Wise Explanations for Non-Linear Classifier Decisions by Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation. PLoS ONE, 2015.
  5. How to explain individual classification decisions. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2010.
  6. Approximating CNNs with Bag-of-local-Features models works surprisingly well on ImageNet. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). OpenReview.net, 2019.
  7. This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognition. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2019.
  8. RandAugment: Practical data augmentation with no separate search. CoRR, abs/1909.13719, 2019.
  9. The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank. Psychometrika, 1936.
  10. Tiny ImageNet Visual Recognition Challenge. https://tiny-imagenet.herokuapp.com/. Accessed: 2020-11-10.
  11. MaxGain: Regularisation of Neural Networks by Constraining Activation Magnitudes. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases - European Conference, ECML PKDD 2018, 2018.
  12. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016.
  13. Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertainty. In Kamalika Chaudhuri and Ruslan Salakhutdinov, editors, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research (PMLR), 2019.
  14. DE-CapsNet: A Diverse Enhanced Capsule Network with Disperse Dynamic Routing. Applied Sciences, 2020.
  15. Dynamic filter networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2016.
  16. Alex Krizhevsky. Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images. Technical report, University of Toronto, 2009.
  17. learningai.io. VGGNet and Tiny ImageNet. https://learningai.io/projects/2017/06/29/tiny-imagenet.html. Accessed: 2020-11-08.
  18. MNIST handwritten digit database. ATT Labs [Online]. Available: http://yann.lecun.com/exdb/mnist, 2, 2010.
  19. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2017.
  20. On the Number of Linear Regions of Deep Neural Networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2014.
  21. Rectified Linear Units Improve Restricted Boltzmann Machines. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2010.
  22. RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Models. In British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC), 2018.
  23. ”Why Should I Trust You?”: Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD), 2016.
  24. Dynamic Routing Between Capsules. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2017.
  25. Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization. In International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2017.
  26. Irhum Shafkat. Intuitively Understanding Convolutions for Deep Learning. https://towardsdatascience.com/intuitively-understanding-convolutions-for-deep-learning-1f6f42faee1#ad33, 2018.
  27. Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2017.
  28. Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), Workshop, 2014.
  29. Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition. In Yoshua Bengio and Yann LeCun, editors, International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2015.
  30. Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Net. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), Workshop, 2015.
  31. Full-Gradient Representation for Neural Network Visualization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2019.
  32. Lei Sun. ResNet on Tiny ImageNet. http://cs231n.stanford.edu/reports/2017/pdfs/12.pdf, 2016. Accessed: 2020-11-16.
  33. Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks. In Doina Precup and Yee Whye Teh, editors, International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2017.
  34. An improved residual network model for image recognition using a combination of snapshot ensembles and the cutout technique. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2020.
  35. Show, attend and tell: Neural image caption generation with visual attention. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2015.
  36. On compressing deep models by low rank and sparse decomposition. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2017.
  37. Wide Residual Networks. In British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC), 2016.
  38. Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2014.
  39. Top-Down Neural Attention by Excitation Backprop. Int. J. Comput. Vis., 2018.
  40. Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localization. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016.
Citations (52)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

Overview of Convolutional Dynamic Alignment Networks for Interpretable Classifications

The paper introduces Convolutional Dynamic Alignment Networks (CoDA-Nets), a novel family of neural network models designed to improve the interpretability of classification tasks while maintaining competitive performance. CoDA-Nets address the ongoing challenge in deep learning of understanding and explaining model decisions. The central innovation in CoDA-Nets is the Dynamic Alignment Unit (DAU), which enables the network to compute input-dependent linear transformations aligned with task-relevant patterns.

Key Contributions

  1. Dynamic Alignment Units (DAUs): CoDA-Nets are built around DAUs, which create weights dynamically aligned with discriminative input patterns, allowing for an interpretable linear decomposition of the output. This approach bridges the gap between the interpretability of linear models and the complex capabilities of neural networks.
  2. Model-Inherent Explanations: CoDA-Nets provide their own explanations for model predictions through contribution maps, which highlight the input areas most influential in making a decision. These maps outperform traditional attribution methods in quantitative assessments.
  3. Competitive Performance: Despite a focus on interpretability, CoDA-Nets achieve classification accuracies comparable to models such as ResNet and VGG on datasets like CIFAR-10 and TinyImagenet, demonstrating that transparency does not require sacrificing accuracy.

Methodology and Results

The paper details how CoDA-Nets employ a series of input-dependent linear transformations facilitated by DAUs. Each DAU transforms its input linearly, with its weight matrix dynamically aligning with relevant input features. This alignment optimizes the network to focus on task-relevant parts of the data, resulting in high-quality contribution maps naturally embedded within the model's architecture.

CoDA-Nets outperform existing attribution methods, as shown by evaluations against localization and pixel-removal metrics. These methods are typically computationally expensive as post-hoc explanations, whereas CoDA-Nets integrate explanation into their internal mechanics, offering efficiency and accuracy.

By adjusting parameters such as temperature scaling in their training regime, the authors demonstrate that interpretability can be controlled and enhanced without manual feature engineering or separate model approximations.

Broader Implications

CoDA-Nets signify a step forward in designing inherently interpretable neural architectures, an essential development for applications in fields requiring transparency and trust, such as healthcare and autonomous systems. This architectural paradigm could inspire further explorations into dynamic, self-explaining AI models that emphasize clear decision-making processes, enabling broader adoption of AI systems in critical domains.

Future Directions

The research opens pathways for integrating more complex interpretability mechanisms directly into neural architectures. As CoDA-Nets scale with optimized implementations, there is potential for deploying these models in larger-scale applications, including real-time scenarios where interpretability and speed are critical. Moreover, the interplay between interpretability and other neural network features like robustness and transferability presents a promising area for further investigation.

In conclusion, this paper positions CoDA-Nets as both a feasible and effective solution for interpretable AI, blending performance with transparency, and setting a foundation for future progress in self-explaining machine learning systems.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com