Topological obstructions to quantum computation with unitary oracles (2011.10031v3)
Abstract: Algorithms with unitary oracles can be nested, which makes them extremely versatile. An example is the phase estimation algorithm used in many candidate algorithms for quantum speed-up. The search for new quantum algorithms benefits from understanding their limitations: Some tasks are impossible in quantum circuits, although their classical versions are easy, for example, cloning. An example with a unitary oracle $U$ is the if clause, the task to implement controlled $U$ (up to the phase on $U$). In classical computation the conditional statement is easy and essential. In quantum circuits the if clause was shown impossible from one query to $U$. Is it possible from polynomially many queries? Here we unify algorithms with a unitary oracle and develop a topological method to prove their limitations: No number of queries to $U$ and $U\dagger$ lets quantum circuits implement the if clause, even if admitting approximations, postselection and relaxed causality. We also show limitations of process tomography, oracle neutralization, and $\sqrt[\dim U]{U}$, $UT$, and $U\dagger$ algorithms. Our results strengthen an advantage of linear optics, challenge the experiments on relaxed causality, and motivate new algorithms with many-outcome measurements.
- P. W. Shor. Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring. In Proceedings 35th annual symposium on foundations of computer science, pages 124–134. IEEE, 1994.
- Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations. Physical review letters, 103(15):150502, 2009.
- Quantum speed-ups for solving semidefinite programs. In 2017 IEEE 58th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 415–426. IEEE, 2017.
- Quantum SDP-solvers: Better upper and lower bounds. Quantum, 4:230, 2020.
- Quantum metropolis sampling. Nature, 471(7336):87–90, 2011.
- Simulation of electronic structure hamiltonians using quantum computers. Molecular Physics, 109(5):735–750, 2011.
- A. Y. Kitaev. Quantum measurements and the abelian stabilizer problem. arXiv:quant-ph/9511026.
- Quantum lower bounds by polynomials. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 48(4):778–797, 2001.
- Strengths and weaknesses of quantum computing. SIAM journal on Computing, 26(5):1510–1523, 1997.
- A. Ambainis. Quantum lower bounds by quantum arguments. In Proceedings of the thirty-second annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 636–643, 2000.
- Negative weights make adversaries stronger. In Proceedings of the thirty-ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 526–535, 2007.
- L. K. Grover. A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 212–219, 1996.
- A single quantum cannot be cloned. Nature, 299(5886):802–803, 1982.
- Impossibility of deleting an unknown quantum state. Nature, 404(6774):164–165, 2000.
- Optimal manipulations with qubits: Universal-not gate. Physical Review A, 60(4):R2626, 1999.
- Programmable quantum gate arrays. Physical Review Letters, 79(2):321, 1997.
- Quantum cryptography. Reviews of modern physics, 74(1):145, 2002.
- Probabilistic theories with purification. Physical Review A, 81(6):062348, 2010.
- B. Coecke and R. Duncan. Interacting quantum observables: categorical algebra and diagrammatics. New Journal of Physics, 13(4):043016, 2011.
- A. Kent. Quantum tasks in minkowski space. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 29(22):224013, 2012.
- W. H. Zurek. Quantum darwinism. Nature physics, 5(3):181–188, 2009.
- P. M. Vitányi. Quantum kolmogorov complexity based on classical descriptions. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 47(6):2464–2479, 2001.
- V. Bužek and M. Hillery. Quantum copying: Beyond the no-cloning theorem. Physical Review A, 54(3):1844, 1996.
- Quantum copying: A network. Physical Review A, 56(5):3446, 1997.
- Probabilistic cloning and identification of linearly independent quantum states. Physical review letters, 80(22):4999, 1998.
- Approximate programmable quantum processors. Physical Review A, 73(2):022345, 2006.
- Optimal universal programming of unitary gates. Physical Review Letters, 125(21):210501, 2020.
- Storing quantum dynamics in quantum states: A stochastic programmable gate. Physical review letters, 88(4):047905, 2002.
- Optimal probabilistic storage and retrieval of unitary channels. Physical review letters, 122(17):170502, 2019.
- S. Ishizaka and T. Hiroshima. Quantum teleportation scheme by selecting one of multiple output ports. Physical Review A, 79(4):042306, 2009.
- A. Chefles and S. M. Barnett. Strategies and networks for state-dependent quantum cloning. Physical Review A, 60(1):136, 1999.
- N. Gisin and S. Massar. Optimal quantum cloning machines. Physical review letters, 79(11):2153, 1997.
- Optimal universal quantum cloning and state estimation. Physical review letters, 81(12):2598, 1998.
- M. Keyl and R. F. Werner. Optimal cloning of pure states, testing single clones. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 40(7):3283–3299, 1999.
- R. F. Werner. Optimal cloning of pure states. Physical Review A, 58(3):1827, 1998.
- Quantum circuits cannot control unknown operations. New Journal of Physics, 16(9):093026, 2014.
- Complex conjugation supermap of unitary quantum maps and its universal implementation protocol. Physical Review Research, 1(1):013007, 2019.
- Reversing unknown quantum transformations: Universal quantum circuit for inverting general unitary operations. Physical Review Letters, 123(21):210502, 2019.
- Probabilistic exact universal quantum circuits for transforming unitary operations. Physical Review A, 100(6):062339, 2019.
- Approximating fractional time quantum evolution. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 42(18):185302, 2009.
- Quantum singular value transformation and beyond: exponential improvements for quantum matrix arithmetics. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 193–204, 2019.
- A. Bogdanov and L. Trevisan. Average-case complexity. Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science, 2(1):1–106, 2006.
- Quantum computations without definite causal structure. Physical Review A, 88(2):022318, 2013.
- Quantum correlations with no causal order. Nature communications, 3(1):1092, 2012.
- O. Oreshkov. Time-delocalized quantum subsystems and operations: on the existence of processes with indefinite causal structure in quantum mechanics. Quantum, 3:206, 2019.
- N. Paunković and M. Vojinović. Causal orders, quantum circuits and spacetime: distinguishing between definite and superposed causal orders. Quantum, 4:275, 2020.
- Experimental superposition of orders of quantum gates. Nature communications, 6(1):7913, 2015.
- Indefinite causal order in a quantum switch. Physical review letters, 121(9):090503, 2018.
- Experimental verification of an indefinite causal order. Science advances, 3(3):e1602589, 2017.
- Elementary gates for quantum computation. Physical review A, 52(5):3457, 1995.
- M. A. Nielsen and I. Chuang. Quantum computation and quantum information, 2002.
- A. Soeda. Limitations on quantum subroutine designing due to the linear structure of quantum operators. In The 3rd International Conference on Quantum Information and Technology (ICQIT2013). NII, Tokyo, 2013.
- Quantum plug n’play: modular computation in the quantum regime. New Journal of Physics, 20(1):013004, 2018.
- Controlled quantum operations and combs, and their applications to universal controllization of divisible unitary operations. arXiv:1911.01645.
- S. Aaronson. The ten most annoying questions in quantum computing, 2006. Retrieved from https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=112.
- E. L. Hahn. Spin echoes. Physical review, 80(4):580, 1950.
- R. P. Feynman. Simulating physics with computers. Int. j. Theor. phys, 21(6/7), 1982.
- D. S. Abrams and S. Lloyd. Simulation of many-body fermi systems on a universal quantum computer. Physical Review Letters, 79(13):2586, 1997.
- Fermionic quantum computation. Annals of Physics, 298(1):210–226, 2002.
- S. Aaronson and A. Arkhipov. The computational complexity of linear optics. In Proceedings of the forty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 333–342, 2011.
- Prescription for experimental determination of the dynamics of a quantum black box. Journal of Modern Optics, 44(11-12):2455–2467, 1997.
- Complete characterization of a quantum process: the two-bit quantum gate. Physical Review Letters, 78(2):390, 1997.
- D. W. C. Leung. Towards robust quantum computation. PhD thesis, Stanford university, 2000.
- H. Buhrman and R. de Wolf. Complexity measures and decision tree complexity: a survey. Theoretical Computer Science, 288(1):21–43, 2002.
- S. Aaronson. Quantum computing, postselection, and probabilistic polynomial-time. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 461(2063):3473–3482, 2005.
- Ä. Baumeler and S. Wolf. The space of logically consistent classical processes without causal order. New Journal of Physics, 18(1):013036, 2016.
- Z. Gavorová. Notes on distinguishability of postselected computations. arXiv:2011.08487.
- K. Borsuk. Drei sätze über die n-dimensionale euklidische sphäre. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 20(1):177–190, 1933.
- Projected least-squares quantum process tomography. Quantum, 6:844, 2022.
- Quantum circuits with mixed states. In Proceedings of the thirtieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 20–30, 1998.
- S. Lloyd. Universal quantum simulators. Science, 273(5278):1073–1078, 1996.
- Efficient quantum circuits for schur and clebsch-gordan transforms. Physical review letters, 97(17):170502, 2006.
- W. Van Dam and G. Seroussi. Efficient quantum algorithms for estimating gauss sums. arXiv preprint quant-ph/0207131, 2002.
- Computational advantage from quantum-controlled ordering of gates. Physical review letters, 113(25):250402, 2014.
- L. A. Levin. Average case complete problems. SIAM Journal on Computing, 15(1):285–286, 1986.
- Smoothed analysis: an attempt to explain the behavior of algorithms in practice. Communications of the ACM, 52(10):76–84, 2009.
- M. Bläser and B. Manthey. Smoothed complexity theory. ACM Transactions on Computation Theory (TOCT), 7(2):1–21, 2015.
- A. Blum and J. Dunagan. Smoothed analysis of the perceptron algorithm for linear programming. In Proceedings of the thirteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, pages 905–914, 2002.
- U. Chabaud and S. Mehraban. Holomorphic representation of quantum computations. Quantum, 6:831, 2022.
- A. Hatcher. Algebraic topology. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000.
- D. McDuff and D. Salamon. Introduction to symplectic topology. Oxford University Press, 2017.
- J. R. Munkres. Topology. Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2000. Second edition of [ MR0464128].
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.