2000 character limit reached
Simulation of Human and Artificial Emotion (SHArE)
Published 4 Nov 2020 in cs.AI, cs.CY, and cs.LG | (2011.02151v2)
Abstract: The framework for Simulation of Human and Artificial Emotion (SHArE) describes the architecture of emotion in terms of parameters transferable between psychology, neuroscience, and artificial intelligence. These parameters can be defined as abstract concepts or granularized down to the voltage levels of individual neurons. This model enables emotional trajectory design for humans which may lead to novel therapeutic solutions for various mental health concerns. For artificial intelligence, this work provides a compact notation which can be applied to neural networks as a means to observe the emotions and motivations of machines.
- T. M. Moerland, J. Broekens, and C. M. Jonker, “Emotion in reinforcement learning agents and robots: a survey,” vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 443–480.
- D. Sander, D. Grandjean, and K. R. Scherer, “A systems approach to appraisal mechanisms in emotion,” vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 317–352.
- J. Gratch and S. Marsella, “Evaluating a computational model of emotion,” vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 23–43.
- M. S. El-Nasr, J. Yen, and T. R. Ioerger, “FLAME—fuzzy logic adaptive model of emotions,” vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 219–257.
- A. Ghandeharioun, D. McDuff, M. Czerwinski, and K. Rowan, “EMMA: An emotion-aware wellbeing chatbot,” in 2019 8th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), pp. 1–7, IEEE.
- D. B. Dwyer, P. Falkai, and N. Koutsouleris, “Machine learning approaches for clinical psychology and psychiatry,” vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 91–118.
- J. Gottman, C. Swanson, and K. Swanson, “A general systems theory of marriage: Nonlinear difference equation modeling of marital interaction,” vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 326–340.
- R. Chinmayi, G. J. Nair, M. Soundarya, D. S. Poojitha, G. Venugopal, and J. Vijayan, “Extracting the features of emotion from EEG signals and classify using affective computing,” in 2017 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET), pp. 2032–2036, IEEE.
- Y. Kim, “Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification,” in Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 1746–1751, Association for Computational Linguistics.
- M. Peters, M. Neumann, M. Iyyer, M. Gardner, C. Clark, K. Lee, and L. Zettlemoyer, “Deep contextualized word representations,” in Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers), pp. 2227–2237, Association for Computational Linguistics.
- J. Pennington, R. Socher, and C. Manning, “Glove: Global vectors for word representation,” in Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 1532–1543, Association for Computational Linguistics.
- K. Cho, B. van Merrienboer, C. Gulcehre, D. Bahdanau, F. Bougares, H. Schwenk, and Y. Bengio, “Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder–decoder for statistical machine translation,” in Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 1724–1734, Association for Computational Linguistics.
- J. Yang, R. Wang, X. Guan, M. M. Hassan, A. Almogren, and A. Alsanad, “AI-enabled emotion-aware robot: The fusion of smart clothing, edge clouds and robotics,” vol. 102, pp. 701–709.
- Y. Luo, J. Ye, R. B. Adams, J. Li, M. G. Newman, and J. Z. Wang, “ARBEE: Towards automated recognition of bodily expression of emotion in the wild,” vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 1–25.
- M.-J. Han, C.-H. Lin, and K.-T. Song, “Robotic emotional expression generation based on mood transition and personality model,” vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1290–1303.
- X. Xu, K. D. Craig, D. Diaz, M. S. Goodwin, M. Akcakaya, B. T. Susam, J. S. Huang, and V. R. de Sa, “Automated pain detection in facial videos of children using human-assisted transfer learning,” in Artificial Intelligence in Health (F. Koch, A. Koster, D. Riaño, S. Montagna, M. Schumacher, A. ten Teije, C. Guttmann, M. Reichert, I. Bichindaritz, P. Herrero, R. Lenz, B. López, C. Marling, C. Martin, S. Montani, and N. Wiratunga, eds.), vol. 11326, pp. 162–180, Springer International Publishing. Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
- Haifeng Zhang, W. Su, J. Yu, and Z. Wang, “Weakly supervised local-global relation network for facial expression recognition,” in Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1040–1046, International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization.
- A. G. Huth, W. A. de Heer, T. L. Griffiths, F. E. Theunissen, and J. L. Gallant, “Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex,” vol. 532, no. 7600, pp. 453–458.
- P. Ekman and D. Cordaro, “What is meant by calling emotions basic,” vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 364–370.
- University of Illinois Press.
- R. Reisenzein, “Emotions as metarepresentational states of mind: Naturalizing the belief–desire theory of emotion,” vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 6–20.
- J. Hoey, T. Schröder, and A. Alhothali, “Affect control processes: Intelligent affective interaction using a partially observable markov decision process,” vol. 230, pp. 134–172.
- L. F. Barrett, “The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization,” p. nsw154.
- E. Musk and Neuralink, “An integrated brain-machine interface platform with thousands of channels,” vol. 21, no. 10, p. e16194.
- A. B. Warriner, V. Kuperman, and M. Brysbaert, “Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 english lemmas,” vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 1191–1207.
- H. Haj-Ali, A. K. Anderson, and A. Kron, “Comparing three models of arousal in the human brain,” vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–11.
- A. Mollahosseini, B. Hasani, and M. H. Mahoor, “AffectNet: A database for facial expression, valence, and arousal computing in the wild,” vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 18–31.
- M. El Ayadi, M. S. Kamel, and F. Karray, “Survey on speech emotion recognition: Features, classification schemes, and databases,” vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 572–587.
- M. M. Bradley, L. Miccoli, M. A. Escrig, and P. J. Lang, “The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation,” vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 602–607.
- L. Germine, T. L. Benson, F. Cohen, and C. I. Hooker, “Psychosis-proneness and the rubber hand illusion of body ownership,” vol. 207, no. 1, pp. 45–52.
- M. Tsakiris, S. Schütz-Bosbach, and S. Gallagher, “On agency and body-ownership: Phenomenological and neurocognitive reflections,” vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 645–660.
- A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, “Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.,” vol. 185, no. 4157, pp. 1124–1131. Place: US Publisher: American Assn for the Advancement of Science.
- D. Keltner, A. Kogan, P. K. Piff, and S. R. Saturn, “The sociocultural appraisals, values, and emotions (SAVE) framework of prosociality: Core processes from gene to meme,” vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 425–460.
- C. L. Baker, R. Saxe, and J. B. Tenenbaum, “Action understanding as inverse planning,” vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 329–349.
- I. Grossmann, M. Feinberg, D. C. Parker, N. A. Christakis, P. E. Tetlock, and W. A. Cunningham, “AI and the transformation of social science research,” vol. 380, no. 6650, pp. 1108–1109.
- OpenAI, “GPT-3.5 "ChatGPT".”
- “Human simulation: Perspectives, insights, and applications.”
- A. Glöckner and C. Witteman, “Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making,” vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–25.
- A. W. Kruglanski and E. P. Thompson, “Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel,” vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 83–109.
Sponsor
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.