Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 44 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 86 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 208 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 447 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Efficient density-fitted explicitly correlated dispersion and exchange dispersion energies (2011.00181v2)

Published 31 Oct 2020 in physics.chem-ph

Abstract: The leading-order dispersion and exchange-dispersion terms in symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (SAPT), $E{(20)}_{\rm disp}$ and $E{(20)}_{\rm exch-disp}$, suffer from slow convergence to the complete basis set limit. To alleviate this problem, explicitly correlated variants of these corrections, $E{(20)}_{\rm disp}$-F12 and $E{(20)}_{\rm exch-disp}$-F12, have been proposed recently. However, the original formalism (M. Kodrycka et al., J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 5965-5986), while highly successful in terms of improving convergence, was not competitive to conventional orbital-based SAPT in terms of computational efficiency due to the need to manipulate several kinds of two-electron integrals. In this work, we eliminate this need by decomposing all types of two-electron integrals using robust density fitting. We demonstrate that the error of the density fitting approximation is negligible when standard auxiliary bases such as aug-cc-pVXZ/MP2FIT are employed. The new implementation allowed us to study all complexes in the A24 database in basis sets up to aug-cc-pV5Z, and the $E{(20)}_{\rm disp}$-F12 and $E{(20)}_{\rm exch-disp}$-F12 values exhibit vastly improvement basis set convergence over their conventional counterparts. The well-converged $E{(20)}_{\rm disp}$-F12 and $E{(20)}_{\rm exch-disp}$-F12 numbers can be substituted for conventional $E{(20)}_{\rm disp}$ and $E{(20)}_{\rm exch-disp}$ ones in a calculation of the total SAPT interaction energy at any level (SAPT0, SAPT2+3, ...). We show that the addition of F12 terms does not improve the accuracy of low-level SAPT treatments. However, when the theory errors are minimized in high-level SAPT approaches such as SAPT2+3(CCD)$\delta$MP2, the reduction of basis set incompleteness errors thanks to the F12 treatment substantially improves the accuracy of small-basis calculations.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube