Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 148 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 94 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 214 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 429 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The geodesic motion of S2 and G2 as a test of the fermionic dark matter nature of our galactic core (2007.11478v1)

Published 22 Jul 2020 in astro-ph.GA and gr-qc

Abstract: [Abridged] The S-stars motion around the Galactic center (Sgr A*) implies the existence of a compact source with a mass of about $4\times 106 M_\odot$, traditionally assumed to be a massive black hole (BH). Important for any model is the explanation of the multiyear, accurate astrometric data of S2 and the challenging G2: its post-pericenter velocity decelerates faster than expected from a Keplerian orbit around the putative BH. This has been reconciled in the literature by acting on G2 a drag force by an accretion flow. Alternatively, we show that the S2 and G2 motion is explained by the "core-halo" fermionic dark matter (DM) profile of the fully-relativistic Ruffini-Arg\"uelles-Rueda (RAR) model. It has been already shown that for 48-345 keV fermions, it accurately fits the rotation curves of the Milky-Way halo. We here show that, for a fermion mass of 56 keV, it explains the time-dependent data of the position (orbit) and light-of-sight radial velocity (redshift function $z$) of S2 and G2, the latter without a drag force. We find the RAR model fits better the data: the mean of reduced chi-squares of the orbit and $z$ data are, for S2, $\langle\bar{\chi}2\rangle_{\rm S2, RAR}\approx 3.1$ and $\langle\bar{\chi}2\rangle_{\rm S2, BH}\approx 3.3$ while, for G2, $\langle\bar{\chi}2\rangle_{\rm G2, RAR}\approx 20$ and $\langle\bar{\chi}2\rangle_{\rm G2, BH}\approx 41$. For S2 the fits of the $z$ data are comparable, $\bar{\chi}2_{z,\rm RAR}\approx 1.28$ and $\bar{\chi}2_{z,\rm BH}\approx 1.04$, for G2 only the RAR model fits, $\bar{\chi}2_{z,\rm RAR}\approx 1.0$ and $\bar{\chi}2_{z,\rm BH}\approx 26$. In addition, the critical mass for the gravitational collapse of a degenerate 56 keV-fermion DM core into a BH is $\sim 108 M_\odot$, which may be the initial seed for the formation of the observed central supermassive BH in active galaxies, such as M87.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.