Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 105 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 45 tok/s
GPT-5 High 34 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 108 tok/s
GPT OSS 120B 473 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 218 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

It has to be cool: on supergiant progenitors of binary black hole mergers from common-envelope evolution (2006.11286v2)

Published 19 Jun 2020 in astro-ph.SR and astro-ph.HE

Abstract: Common-envelope (CE) evolution in massive binary systems is thought to be one of the most promising channels for the formation of compact binary mergers. In the case of merging binary black holes (BBHs), the essential CE phase takes place at a stage when the first BH is already formed and the companion star expands as a supergiant. We study which BH binaries with supergiant companions will evolve through and potentially survive a CE phase. To this end, we compute envelope binding energies from detailed massive stellar models at different evolutionary stages and metallicities. We make multiple physically extreme choices of assumptions that favor easier CE ejection as well as account for recent advancements in mass transfer stability criteria. We find that even with the most optimistic assumptions, a successful CE ejection in BH (and also NS) binaries is only possible if the donor is a massive convective-envelope giant, a red supergiant (RSG). In other words, pre-CE progenitors of BBH mergers are BH binaries with RSG companions. We find that due to its influence on the radial expansion of massive giants, metallicity has an indirect but a very strong effect on the envelope structure and binding energies of RSGs. Our results suggest that merger rates from population synthesis models could be severely overestimated, especially at low metallicity. Additionally, the lack of observed RSGs with luminosities above log($L/L_{\odot}$) = 5.6-5.8, corresponding to stars with $M > 40 M_{\odot}$, puts into question the viability of the CE channel for the formation of the most massive BBH mergers. Either such RSGs elude detection due to very short lifetimes, or they do not exist and the CE channel can only produce BBH systems with total mass $< 50 M_{\odot}$. We discuss an alternative CE scenario, in which a partial envelope ejection is followed by a phase of possibly long and stable mass transfer.

Citations (60)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.