Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description Length (2003.12298v1)

Published 27 Mar 2020 in cs.CL

Abstract: To measure how well pretrained representations encode some linguistic property, it is common to use accuracy of a probe, i.e. a classifier trained to predict the property from the representations. Despite widespread adoption of probes, differences in their accuracy fail to adequately reflect differences in representations. For example, they do not substantially favour pretrained representations over randomly initialized ones. Analogously, their accuracy can be similar when probing for genuine linguistic labels and probing for random synthetic tasks. To see reasonable differences in accuracy with respect to these random baselines, previous work had to constrain either the amount of probe training data or its model size. Instead, we propose an alternative to the standard probes, information-theoretic probing with minimum description length (MDL). With MDL probing, training a probe to predict labels is recast as teaching it to effectively transmit the data. Therefore, the measure of interest changes from probe accuracy to the description length of labels given representations. In addition to probe quality, the description length evaluates "the amount of effort" needed to achieve the quality. This amount of effort characterizes either (i) size of a probing model, or (ii) the amount of data needed to achieve the high quality. We consider two methods for estimating MDL which can be easily implemented on top of the standard probing pipelines: variational coding and online coding. We show that these methods agree in results and are more informative and stable than the standard probes.

Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description Length: A Comprehensive Analysis

The paper introduces a novel approach to evaluating pretrained representations by employing information-theoretic probing using Minimum Description Length (MDL). Traditional probing methods rely on accuracy as a metric to gauge how well representations encode linguistic properties; however, accuracy often fails to capture differences effectively, thereby diminishing the reliability of such assessments. As the authors argue, pretrained representations and randomly initialized ones display similar accuracy levels under conventional probing. To address these deficiencies, this work proposes a shift in the metric from accuracy to description length, emphasizing the compression efficiency of labels given the representations.

The Concept of MDL Probing

The central tenet of MDL probing is the recasting of the probe training process as an exercise in data transmission. The MDL framework assesses both the quality of the model—the probe—and the effort required to encode that quality, presenting a more holistic view of what the representations truly capture. The effort is quantified concerning either the model size or the amount of data required to infer high-quality labels. The implication here is profound: the real measure of information encoded in representations is not just whether high accuracy is achieved but how efficiently that accuracy can be realized.

To estimate MDL, the paper proffers two methods: variational coding and online coding. Variational coding incorporates the cost of transmitting the model alongside the data, thus embodying the full Bayes loss function. Online coding, meanwhile, adopts a sequential approach to data transmission, where data is chunked and encoded incrementally. Both methods agree on their results and offer stability and informative evaluations that standard probes do not.

Numerical Strength and Empirical Validation

Several experiments back the theoretical claims outlined in the paper. Notably, the comparison between MDL probing and traditional accuracy-based probing is validated across multiple tasks and settings. For instance, probing results for part-of-speech tasks demonstrate that while accuracy fails to delineate between genuine linguistic tasks and control tasks effectively, MDL measures manage to draw significant distinctions. Interesting findings from the experiments show how MDL naturally adjusts to reveal insights, such as the simplicity of linguistic representation encoding compared to control or synthetic tasks, where efforts to encode are inherently higher.

Furthermore, experiments showcase consistency across various hyperparameters and random seeds, highlighting MDL's robustness and stability—a property not held by accuracy alone. These insights present clear evidence that MDL probing reveals deeper characteristics of linguistic representations, such as regularity strength, that are implicit yet powerful in understanding data encodings.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

The MDL framework is poised to revolutionize how the probing of pretrained representations is conducted. Theoretically, MDL allows for a more nuanced understanding of probing tasks, advocating for consideration of both model complexity and data efficiency. Practically, it means shedding light on the true strengths of representations without skewing results through manual hyperparameter tuning, as traditionally necessitated.

This work lays the groundwork for future explorations and adaptations in AI and NLP, suggesting that future probing tasks could benefit substantially from this method. We might see a departure from sole reliance on accuracy and a movement toward more informative measurement techniques like MDL, enabling a more profound understanding of model capabilities and limitations.

In conclusion, incorporating information-theoretic principles into linguistic probing through MDL has clear potential, offering stable, consistent, and insightful evaluations that transcend the limitations of accuracy-focused methods. With its theoretically motivated design, MDL provides a more comprehensive understanding of model representations, setting a new standard for future research in model probing and evaluation.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Elena Voita (19 papers)
  2. Ivan Titov (108 papers)
Citations (260)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com