Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 30 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 46 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 12 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 91 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 184 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 462 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Structures, stellar population properties, AGN fractions, and environments of massive compact galaxies at $1 < z < 2$ in 3D--{\it HST}/CANDELS (2002.11274v1)

Published 26 Feb 2020 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: We present a study on structures and physical properties of massive ($M_* >10{10} M_{\sun} $) compact galaxies at $1.0<z<2.0$ in five 3D--{\it HST}/CANDELS fields. Compared with the extended star-forming galaxies (eSFGs), compact star-forming galaxies (cSFGs) are found to have the lower level of star formation, and mainly distribute in the quiescent region of the {\it UVJ} diagram. The distributions of dust attenuation and S{\'e}rsic index support that the progenitors of cQGs are cSFGs, and cSFGs are at a transitional phase between eSFGs and cQGs. The prevalence of X-ray selected AGNs ($\sim 28\%$) is confirmed in the cSFGs at $1<z<2$ which indicates that the violent gas-rich processes such as merger and disk instability could drive the structure to be more compact, and trigger both star formation and black hole growth in the central regions. Our results support the "two-step" scenario that the cSFGs at $1<z<2$ are the intermediate population after compaction but before a quick quenching. Our analysis of parametric and nonparametric morphologies shows that cQGs (eQGs) are more concentrated and have less substructures than cSFGs (eSFGs), and quenching and compactness should be associated with each other. The cSFGs at $1.5<z<2$ ($1<z<1.5$) prefer to be in higher (lower) density environment, similar as cQGs (eSFGs). It suggests that merger or strong interaction might be the main driving mechanism of compaction at higher redshifts, whereas the disk instability of individual galaxies might play a more important role on the formation of cSFGs at lower redshifts.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.