Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 159 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 118 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 193 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 430 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 34 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Carbon Isotope Ratios in M10 Giants (1905.00459v1)

Published 1 May 2019 in astro-ph.SR and astro-ph.GA

Abstract: We measured carbon abundances and the ${12}\mathrm{C}/{13}\mathrm{C}$ ratio in 31 giant branch stars with previous CN and CH band measurements that span -2.33 $<$ M${\rm V}$ $<$ 0.18 in the globular cluster M10 (NGC 6254). Abundances were determined by comparing CO features at $\sim 2.3\, \mu \mathrm{m}$ and specifically the ${13}$CO bandhead at $2.37\, \mu \mathrm{m}$, to synthetic spectra generated with MOOG. The observed spectra were obtained with GNIRS on Gemini North with a resolution of R $\approx 3500$. The carbon abundances derived from the IR spectra agree with previous [C/Fe] measurements found using CN and CH features at the near-UV/blue wavelength range. We found an average carbon isotope ratio of ${12}\mathrm{C}/{13}\mathrm{C}$ = 5.10${-0.17}{+0.18}$ for first generation stars (CN-normal; 13 stars total) and ${12}\mathrm{C}/{13}\mathrm{C}$ = 4.84$_{-0.22}{+0.27}$ for second generation stars (CN-enhanced; 15 stars). We therefore find no statistically significant difference in ${12}\mathrm{C}/{13}\mathrm{C}$ ratio between stars in either population for the observed magnitude range. Finally, we created models of the expected carbon, nitrogen, and ${12}\mathrm{C}/{13}\mathrm{C}$ surface abundance evolution on the red giant branch due to thermohaline mixing using the MESA stellar evolution code. The efficiency of the thermohaline mixing must be increased to a factor of $\approx 60$ to match [C/Fe] abundances, and by a factor of $\approx 666$ to match ${12}\mathrm{C}/{13}\mathrm{C}$ ratios. We could not simultaneously fit the evolution of both carbon and the ${12}\mathrm{C}/{13}\mathrm{C}$ ratio with models using the same thermohaline efficiency parameter.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Questions

We haven't generated a list of open questions mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube