Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 70 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 75 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 175 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 447 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Successful and Failed Flux Tube Emergence in the Solar Interior (1902.07969v1)

Published 21 Feb 2019 in astro-ph.SR

Abstract: We report on our three-dimensional (3D) magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations of cylindrical weakly twisted flux tubes emerging from 18 Mm below the photosphere. We perform a parametric study, by varying the initial magnetic field strength ($B_0$), radius ($R$), twist ($\alpha)$ and length of the emerging part of the flux tube ($\lambda$) to investigate how these parameters affect the transfer of the magnetic field from the convection zone to the photosphere. We show that the efficiency of emergence at the photosphere (i.e. how strong the photospheric field will be in comparison to $B_0$) depends not only on the $B_0$ but also the morphology of the emerging field and the twist. We show that parameters such as $B_0$ and magnetic flux cannot alone determine whether a flux tube will emerge to the solar surface. For instance, high-$B_0$ (weak-$B_0$) fields may fail (succeed) to emerge at the photosphere, depending on their geometrical properties. We also show that the photospheric magnetic field strength can vary greatly for flux tubes with the same $B_0$ but different geometric properties. Moreover, in some cases we have found scaling laws, whereby the magnetic field strength scales with the local density as $B\propto \rho\kappa$, where $\kappa \approx 1$ deeper in the convection zone and $\kappa <1$, close to the photosphere. The transition between the two values occurs approximately when the local pressure scale ($H_p$) becomes comparable to the diameter of the flux tube ($H_p\approx2R$). We derive forms to explain how and when these scaling laws appear and compare them with the numerical simulations.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube