Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 62 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 51 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 67 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 192 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 430 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 34 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Black Hole Mass Scaling Relations for Spiral Galaxies. I. $M_{\rm BH}$-$M_{\rm *,sph}$ (1810.04887v3)

Published 11 Oct 2018 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: The (supermassive black hole mass, $M_\text{BH}$)-(bulge stellar mass, $M_{\rm*,sph}$) relation is, obviously, derived using two quantities. We endeavor to provide accurate values for the latter via detailed multicomponent galaxy decompositions for the current full sample of 43 spiral galaxies having directly measured $M_\text{BH}$ values; 35 of these galaxies have been alleged to contain pseudobulges, 21 have water maser measurements, and three appear bulgeless. This more than doubles the previous sample size of spiral galaxies with a finessed image analysis. We have analyzed near-infrared images, accounting for not only the bulge, disk (exponential, truncated, or inclined), and bar but also for spiral arms and rings and additional central components (active galactic nuclei (AGNs), etc.). A symmetric Bayesian analysis finds $\log\left(M_\text{BH}/M_{\odot}\right)=\left(2.44_{-0.31}{+0.35}\right)\log\left{M_{\rm*,sph}/[\upsilon(1.15\times10{10}\,M_{\odot})]\right}+(7.24\pm0.12)$, with $\upsilon$ a stellar mass-to-light ratio term. The level of scatter equals that about the $M_{\rm BH}$-$\sigma_$ relation. The nonlinear slope rules out the idea that many mergers, coupled with the central limit theorem, produced this scaling relation, and it corroborates previous observational studies and simulations, which have reported a near-quadratic slope at the low-mass end of the $M_\text{BH}$-$M_{\rm,sph}$ diagram. Furthermore, bulges with AGNs follow this relation; they are not offset by an order of magnitude, and models that have invoked AGN feedback to establish a linear $M_{\rm BH}$-$M_{\rm*,sph}$ relation need revisiting. We additionally present an updated $M_\text{BH}$-(S\'ersic index, $n_\text{sph}$) relation for spiral galaxy bulges with a comparable level of scatter and a new $M_{\rm*,sph}$-(spiral-arm pitch angle, $\phi$) relation.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.