Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Automated Design using Neural Networks and Gradient Descent (1710.10352v1)

Published 27 Oct 2017 in stat.ML and cs.CE

Abstract: We propose a novel method that makes use of deep neural networks and gradient decent to perform automated design on complex real world engineering tasks. Our approach works by training a neural network to mimic the fitness function of a design optimization task and then, using the differential nature of the neural network, perform gradient decent to maximize the fitness. We demonstrate this methods effectiveness by designing an optimized heat sink and both 2D and 3D airfoils that maximize the lift drag ratio under steady state flow conditions. We highlight that our method has two distinct benefits over other automated design approaches. First, evaluating the neural networks prediction of fitness can be orders of magnitude faster then simulating the system of interest. Second, using gradient decent allows the design space to be searched much more efficiently then other gradient free methods. These two strengths work together to overcome some of the current shortcomings of automated design.

Citations (7)

Summary

  • The paper proposes a novel method for automated design optimization using deep neural networks as surrogate models for fitness functions combined with gradient descent for efficient search.
  • Experimental results demonstrate that this neural network approach achieves optimized designs for tasks like heat sinks and airfoils in significantly fewer iterations and computation time compared to traditional gradient-free methods.
  • The methodology includes improved network architectures and parameterization techniques that enhance accuracy and flexibility, showing potential for application across diverse engineering design challenges.

Overview of "Automated Design using Neural Networks and Gradient Descent"

The paper "Automated Design using Neural Networks and Gradient Descent" by Oliver Hennigh proposes an innovative methodology that leverages deep neural networks coupled with gradient descent to facilitate automated design in complex engineering tasks. The core approach involves training a neural network to approximate the fitness function of a design optimization problem, thereby enabling the efficient exploration of design spaces via gradient descent.

Methodology

The proposed method addresses two critical challenges in automated design: computational inefficiency in physical simulations and the vast design space that needs exploration. The methodology involves creating a surrogate model of the computationally expensive fitness function using a neural network. This neural network can then predict fitness values orders of magnitude faster than conventional system simulations. Furthermore, the differentiable nature of neural networks allows for the application of gradient descent to optimize design parameters, significantly reducing the number of iterations required compared to traditional gradient-free methods such as genetic algorithms or simulated annealing.

Experimental Validation

The effectiveness of this approach is demonstrated through its application in optimizing heat sinks and airfoil geometries. The paper outlines two primary experimental tasks: designing an optimized heat sink to maximize cooling and developing 2D and 3D airfoils with optimal lift-drag ratios under steady-state conditions. The results highlight the method's capability to search design spaces efficiently, achieving optimization results with orders of magnitude fewer iterations compared to gradient-free methods.

For instance, in the heat sink optimization task, the neural network approach converged within approximately 150 iterations, whereas simulated annealing required over 800 iterations for comparable performance. Similarly, for airfoil optimization, the methodology reduced the computation time drastically, demonstrating up to 5000 times faster optimization compared to direct simulations using the Lattice Boltzmann method.

Technical Contributions

The paper makes significant technical advances in the field of automated design optimization. Notably, it develops improved network architectures that enhance predictive accuracy for steady-state fluid flows. The use of a U-network architecture with gated residual blocks facilitates accurate prediction of flow parameters, crucial for designing aerodynamically efficient airfoils. The models iteratively optimize multiple angles of attack to ensure robust airfoil designs with high lift-drag ratios.

Additionally, the methodology includes an innovative use of parameterization networks to handle changes in design variables efficiently. This approach allows for the flexibility needed to tackle different optimization tasks without retraining the network from scratch.

Implications and Future Directions

This research pushes the boundaries of automated design by integrating neural networks and gradient descent into a cohesive framework, thereby addressing significant computational bottlenecks present in traditional methods. The approach not only accelerates the design process but also enhances the scalability of optimization tasks in engineering fields.

Future work could explore the application of this methodology to more complex design challenges, such as structural optimization in turbulent flows or problems related to electromagnetism. The potential integration with hybrid methods to produce initial rough designs that are subsequently refined using high-fidelity simulations presents another promising avenue for research.

In summary, this paper presents a well-founded and effective approach to automated design using neural networks and gradient descent, capable of delivering computationally efficient and highly optimized solutions to complex engineering problems. This work provides a robust foundation upon which more generalized automated design frameworks can be constructed, facilitating advancements across various engineering domains.

Whiteboard

Video Overview

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.