Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 62 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 51 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 67 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 192 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 430 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 34 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

2MTF VI. Measuring the velocity power spectrum (1706.05130v1)

Published 16 Jun 2017 in astro-ph.CO

Abstract: We present measurements of the velocity power spectrum and constraints on the growth rate of structure $f\sigma_{8}$, at redshift zero, using the peculiar motions of 2,062 galaxies in the completed 2MASS Tully-Fisher survey (2MTF). To accomplish this we introduce a model for fitting the velocity power spectrum including the effects of non-linear Redshift Space Distortions (RSD), allowing us to recover unbiased fits down to scales $k=0.2\,h\,{\rm Mpc}{-1}$ without the need to smooth or grid the data. Our fitting methods are validated using a set of simulated 2MTF surveys. Using these simulations we also identify that the Gaussian distributed estimator for peculiar velocities of \cite{Watkins2015} is suitable for measuring the velocity power spectrum, but sub-optimal for the 2MTF data compared to using magnitude fluctuations $\delta m$, and that, whilst our fits are robust to a change in fiducial cosmology, future peculiar velocity surveys with more constraining power may have to marginalise over this. We obtain \textit{scale-dependent} constraints on the growth rate of structure in two bins, finding $f\sigma_{8} = [0.55{+0.16}{-0.13},0.40{+0.16}{-0.17}]$ in the ranges $k = [0.007-0.055, 0.55-0.150]\,h\,{\rm Mpc}{-1}$. We also find consistent results using four bins. Assuming scale-\textit{independence} we find a value $f\sigma_{8} = 0.51{+0.09}_{-0.08}$, a $\sim16\%$ measurement of the growth rate. Performing a consistency check of General Relativity (GR) and combining our results with CMB data only we find $\gamma = 0.45{+0.10}_{-0.11}$, a remarkable constraint considering the small number of galaxies. All of our results are completely independent of the effects of galaxy bias, and fully consistent with the predictions of GR (scale-independent $f\sigma_{8}$ and $\gamma\approx0.55$).

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube