Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 171 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 60 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 188 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 437 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Federated Optimization: Distributed Machine Learning for On-Device Intelligence (1610.02527v1)

Published 8 Oct 2016 in cs.LG

Abstract: We introduce a new and increasingly relevant setting for distributed optimization in machine learning, where the data defining the optimization are unevenly distributed over an extremely large number of nodes. The goal is to train a high-quality centralized model. We refer to this setting as Federated Optimization. In this setting, communication efficiency is of the utmost importance and minimizing the number of rounds of communication is the principal goal. A motivating example arises when we keep the training data locally on users' mobile devices instead of logging it to a data center for training. In federated optimziation, the devices are used as compute nodes performing computation on their local data in order to update a global model. We suppose that we have extremely large number of devices in the network --- as many as the number of users of a given service, each of which has only a tiny fraction of the total data available. In particular, we expect the number of data points available locally to be much smaller than the number of devices. Additionally, since different users generate data with different patterns, it is reasonable to assume that no device has a representative sample of the overall distribution. We show that existing algorithms are not suitable for this setting, and propose a new algorithm which shows encouraging experimental results for sparse convex problems. This work also sets a path for future research needed in the context of \federated optimization.

Citations (1,788)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a federated optimization algorithm that trains models across decentralized, non-IID, unbalanced data, reducing the number of communication rounds.
  • The approach leverages local updates and centralized aggregation to achieve computation and communication efficiency with faster convergence than traditional methods.
  • Experimental results validate its robustness and scalability, highlighting its potential for practical on-device learning and privacy-preserving applications.

Federated Optimization: Distributed Machine Learning for On-Device Intelligence

The paper Federated Optimization: Distributed Machine Learning for On-Device Intelligence, authored by Jakub Konečný, H. Brendan McMahan, Daniel Ramage, and Peter Richtárik, investigates a novel paradigm in distributed machine learning aimed at optimizing model training on decentralized and distributed data sources, primarily on user devices such as smartphones and tablets. This setting is termed federated optimization, which is a cornerstone of federated learning (FL).

Key Contributions and Motivation

Federated optimization addresses three fundamental characteristics typically encountered in modern distributed systems:

  1. Massive Distribution: Data is unevenly spread across a multitude of devices.
  2. Non-IID Data: Data on each device may exhibit different distributions, unlike the commonly assumed IID (Independent and Identically Distributed) structure.
  3. Unbalanced Data: Devices can have widely varying amounts of data.

The motivation behind federated optimization is driven by privacy concerns and the sheer scale of data generated by user interactions on personal devices. Traditional centralized training approaches, which aggregate data on servers, pose privacy risks and incur high communication costs. Federated learning mitigates these issues by keeping data localized on devices and only sharing model updates, thus adhering to principles of data minimization and privacy.

Problem Formulation

The learning objective is formally defined as: minwRdf(w)=1ni=1nfi(w),\min_{w \in \mathbb{R}^d} f(w) = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} f_i(w), where fi(w)f_i(w) represents the cost associated with the ii-th data point. The paper assumes that no single device's data can provide a representative sample of the overall distribution. The formulated optimization problem must be approached where data partitions (PkP_k) do not sum up to IID data.

Federated Optimization Algorithm

A primary contribution is the introduction of a federated optimization algorithm specifically designed to handle the massive distribution, non-IID nature, and imbalance of on-device data. The essence of the algorithm involves iterating over these steps:

  • Local Update: Each device conducts local training based on its own subset of data to compute updates.
  • Server Aggregation: These local updates are then aggregated by a central server to update the global model.

The proposed algorithm tackles sparsity by leveraging a sparsity structure in data during communication, refined for efficiency in gradient updates.

Technical Insights and Novelty

  1. Computation and Communication Efficiency: The proposed algorithm optimizes communication by ensuring that model updates are more substantial and thus reducing the number of communication rounds significantly.
  2. Scalability: With practical implications, the authors show how to adapt gradient descent and coordinate descent algorithms into the federated optimization context, alongside techniques like SVRG (Stochastic Variance Reduced Gradient).

Experimental Validation

The efficacy of the approach is demonstrated through experiments on public datasets, specifically targeting the prediction of comments on Google+ posts based on a bag-of-words feature representation. Notably, the experiments reveal:

  • Convergence: The federated optimization algorithm converges to the optimum with fewer communication rounds than traditional methods, shown by empirical results.
  • Robustness to Data Distribution: The algorithm showed consistent performance regardless of the non-IID distribution of data across devices.

Future Work

Practical implementation of federated optimization poses challenges such as:

  • Asynchronous Execution: Extending the algorithm to support fully asynchronous updates can further enhance real-time learning capabilities.
  • Model Personalization: Methods to efficiently personalize models while leveraging global trends remain an open avenue.
  • Theoretical Boundaries: Further theoretical analysis for convergence in non-convex settings, as commonly encountered in models like neural networks, is required.

Conclusion

Federated optimization presents a robust framework for the decentralized training of machine learning models. This paradigm offers an exciting frontier for both theoretical advancements and practical implementations, potentially transforming how data privacy and model training are balanced in distributed environments. The work sets a solid foundation for achieving high-quality on-device intelligence under stringent communication and privacy constraints.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.