Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 87 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 105 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 471 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 193 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Surface participation and dielectric loss in superconducting qubits (1509.01854v2)

Published 6 Sep 2015 in quant-ph and cond-mat.supr-con

Abstract: We study the energy relaxation times ($T_1$) of superconducting transmon qubits in 3D cavities as a function of dielectric participation ratios of material surfaces. This surface participation ratio, representing the fraction of electric field energy stored in a dissipative surface layer, is computed by a two-step finite-element simulation and experimentally varied by qubit geometry. With a clean electromagnetic environment and suppressed non-equilibrium quasiparticle density, we find an approximately proportional relation between the transmon relaxation rates and surface participation ratios. These results suggest dielectric dissipation arising from material interfaces is the major limiting factor for the $T_1$ of transmons in 3D cQED architecture. Our analysis also supports the notion of spatial discreteness of surface dielectric dissipation.

Citations (275)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

  • The paper reveals that surface dielectric loss is the primary factor limiting T1 in transmon qubits through detailed finite-element simulations and systematic experimental measurements.
  • It employs a two-step simulation strategy and varied qubit geometries to effectively quantify the surface participation ratios influencing dielectric dissipation.
  • The results indicate that lowering surface participation through advanced material treatment and optimized design is critical for enhancing qubit coherence.

An Examination of Surface Participation and Dielectric Loss in Superconducting Qubits

The paper entitled "Surface participation and dielectric loss in superconducting qubits" presents a detailed paper on the key factors limiting the performance of transmon qubits in circuit quantum electrodynamics (cQED). By focusing on the energy relaxation times (T1T_1) of these qubits, particularly within the context of their geometry and surface participation ratios, the authors elucidate the significant impact of dielectric dissipation at material interfaces. This investigation uses a combination of experimental observations and finite-element simulations to isolate and quantify the contribution of surface dielectric loss to the overall limitation of qubit coherence times.

Key Points and Methodology

  1. Finite-Element Simulation Approach: The paper utilizes a two-step finite-element simulation strategy to compute the surface participation ratio efficiently. This approach tackles the challenge posed by the disparate length scales inherent in cQED devices. The simulations reveal that surface regions, particularly around the edges and near the Josephson junction, concentrate a significant portion of the electric field energy, which is critical to understanding dielectric dissipation.
  2. Experimental Design: The paper measures T1T_1 in transmon qubits by systematically varying qubit geometries. This is done to modify the participation ratios of the surfaces in question. Implementing a clean electromagnetic environment while minimizing quasiparticle and radiation losses allows the focus to squarely remain on surface dielectric contributions to relaxation times.
  3. Findings on Surface Participation: It is observed that the relaxation rates of the transmons are linearly proportional to their surface participation ratios. Notably, the paper emphasizes that the integration of a dimensional cutoff is required to accurately portray the impact of surface dielectric loss, further highlighting the notion of spatial discreteness in surface dissipation.
  4. Dielectric Loss Dominance: The results suggest that surface dielectric dissipation at material interfaces remains the primary constraint on T1T_1 in 3D cQED architectures, given the absence of additional limiting mechanisms up to a quality factor of approximately 10710^7. This finding excludes the bulk substrate or junctions as significant contributors under the studied conditions.

Implications and Speculations

The insights gained from this research underscore the importance of addressing surface dielectric dissipation to improve the longevity of superconducting qubits. The consistent proportionality across varied qubit geometries points to the crucial role of surface treatment and material quality in qubit design. Future advancements likely demand both enhanced surface preparation techniques and innovative geometrical strategies to reduce participation ratios further.

In terms of theoretical implications, the paper supports a model of discrete dissipation through localized two-level systems (TLS), impacted by the physical configuration and material interfaces of qubits. This model likely extends beyond the classical view of uniform dielectric loss, urging a reconsideration of surface-engineering strategies at the microscopic scale.

Looking forward, realizing substantial improvements in superconducting qubit performance will necessitate significant material advancements alongside architectural innovations that strategically mitigate surface participation. Efforts in this direction, potentially involving three-dimensional qubit designs or novel material systems, are expected to bridge existing gaps toward realizing qubits with improved coherence times, marking a progressive step in the field of quantum information processing.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.