Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Optimizing User Association and Spectrum Allocation in HetNets: A Utility Perspective

Published 18 Dec 2014 in cs.NI, cs.IT, and math.IT | (1412.5731v1)

Abstract: The joint user association and spectrum allocation problem is studied for multi-tier heterogeneous networks (HetNets) in both downlink and uplink in the interference-limited regime. Users are associated with base-stations (BSs) based on the biased downlink received power. Spectrum is either shared or orthogonally partitioned among the tiers. This paper models the placement of BSs in different tiers as spatial point processes and adopts stochastic geometry to derive the theoretical mean proportionally fair utility of the network based on the coverage rate. By formulating and solving the network utility maximization problem, the optimal user association bias factors and spectrum partition ratios are analytically obtained for the multi-tier network. The resulting analysis reveals that the downlink and uplink user associations do not have to be symmetric. For uplink under spectrum sharing, if all tiers have the same target signal-to-interference ratio (SIR), distance-based user association is shown to be optimal under a variety of path loss and power control settings. For both downlink and uplink, under orthogonal spectrum partition, it is shown that the optimal proportion of spectrum allocated to each tier should match the proportion of users associated with that tier. Simulations validate the analytical results. Under typical system parameters, simulation results suggest that spectrum partition performs better for downlink in terms of utility, while spectrum sharing performs better for uplink with power control.

Citations (162)

Summary

  • The paper reveals asymmetry in user association between downlink and uplink in HetNets, suggesting different strategies may be optimal for each.
  • A key finding shows that a distance-based user association is optimal for uplink performance when all HetNet tiers have identical target signal-to-interference ratios.
  • Under orthogonal spectrum partition, the optimal spectrum allocation for each network tier is directly proportional to the fraction of total users associated with that tier.

Optimizing User Association and Spectrum Allocation in HetNets: A Utility Perspective

This paper addresses the significant problem of optimizing user association and spectrum allocation in multi-tier heterogeneous networks (HetNets). By deploying additional low-power small cell base stations (BSs) such as micro, pico, and femto BSs, HetNets offer a potential solution for the rising mobile data demands that stress traditional macro cellular access networks.

Summary

The research examines the joint user association and spectrum allocation challenges for HetNets in both downlink and uplink under interference-limited conditions. The user association is determined by the downlink received power, adjusted by a bias factor that accounts for the different power levels and densities of various BS tiers. This paper models the BS placement as spatial point processes and employs stochastic geometry to derive theoretical performance metrics.

The primary contribution lies in formulating and solving the network utility maximization problem, achieving optimized user association bias factors, and determining spectrum partition ratios analytically. One critical insight is the asymmetry between downlink and uplink associations. In the uplink under spectrum sharing, a distance-based user association is optimal when BS tiers have identical target signal-to-interference ratios (SIRs). For an orthogonal spectrum partition, a significant finding is that the optimal proportion of spectrum should be proportionate to the number of users associated with each tier.

Analytical and Numerical Findings

  1. Asymmetry in User Association: The analysis reveals that users may benefit from associating with different BSs in downlink and uplink due to differences in interference and power control strategies.
  2. Uplink Optimization: A key result shows that if all BS tiers have the same target SIR, then a distance-based association is optimal in the uplink, which implies connecting each user to its nearest BS helps mitigate interference efficiently.
  3. Spectrum Allocation: For both downlink and uplink under orthogonal spectrum partition, the findings suggest that the spectrum allocated to each tier should directly correspond to the fraction of total users associated with that tier.

The research outcomes are validated through simulations using typical system parameters. The simulation results confirm that spectrum partitioning is usually more beneficial for downlink utility, while uplink systems enjoy more advantages with spectrum sharing complemented by power control.

Implications and Future Directions

The practical implications of this research are substantial for the design and operation of HetNets. The insights on asymmetrical user association can influence new strategies for decoupling downlink and uplink connections, potentially leading to more flexible and efficient network designs. The study also underscores the necessity of carefully balancing spectrum sharing and partitioning based on specific use cases and network conditions.

Future research could explore the dynamic aspects of user association and spectrum allocation, considering real-time network conditions and user mobility. It could also explore more advanced power control mechanisms beyond fractional control to further enhance the utility of HetNet deployments.

Conclusion

By leveraging stochastic geometry, this paper provides a robust analytical framework for optimizing user association and spectrum allocation in HetNets. The results offer critical insights for maximizing network utility, with practical guidelines for balancing spectrum and managing user associations in complex network environments. As HetNets evolve, these findings serve as a foundation for developing more sophisticated and efficient cellular network architectures.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Authors (4)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.