Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 70 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 37 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 34 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 21 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 191 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 448 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 35 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Heaps and Two Exponential Structures (1407.0242v3)

Published 1 Jul 2014 in math.CO

Abstract: Take ${\sf Q}=({\sf Q}1,{\sf Q}_2,\ldots)$ to be an exponential structure and $M(n)$ to be the number of minimal elements of ${\sf Q}_n$ where $M(0)=1$. Then a sequence of numbers ${r_n({\sf Q}_n)}{n\ge 1}$ is defined by the equation \begin{eqnarray*} \sum_{n\ge 1}r_n({\sf Q}n)\frac{zn}{n!\,M(n)}=-\log(\sum{n\ge 0}(-1)n\frac{zn}{n!\,M(n)}). \end{eqnarray*} Let $\bar{{\sf Q}}n$ denote the poset ${\sf Q}_n$ with a $\hat{0}$ adjoined and let $\hat{1}$ denote the unique maximal element in the poset ${\sf Q}_n$. Furthermore, let $\mu{{\sf Q}n}$ be the M\"{o}bius function on the poset $\bar{{\sf Q}}_n$. Stanley proved that $r_n({\sf Q}_n)=(-1)n\mu{{\sf Q}n}(\hat{0},\hat{1})$. This implies that the numbers $r_n({\sf Q}_n)$ are integers. In this paper, we study the cases ${\sf Q}_n=\Pi_n{(r)}$ and ${\sf Q}_n={\sf Q}_n{(r)}$ where $\Pi_n{(r)}$ and ${\sf Q}_n{(r)}$ are posets, respectively, of set partitions of $[rn]$ whose block sizes are divisible by $r$ and of $r$-partitions of $[n]$. In both cases we prove that $r_n(\Pi_n{(r)})$ and $r_n({\sf Q}_n{(r)})$ enumerate the pyramids by applying the Cartier-Foata monoid identity and further prove that $r_n(\Pi_n{(r)})$ is the generalized Euler number $E{rn-1}$ and that $r_n({\sf Q}n{(2)})$ is the number of complete non-ambiguous trees of size $2n-1$ by bijections. This gives a new proof of Welker's theorem that $r_n(\Pi_n{(r)})=E{rn-1}$ and implies the construction of $r$-dimensional complete non-ambiguous trees. As a bonus of applying the theory of heaps, we establish a bijection between the set of complete non-ambiguous forests and the set of pairs of permutations with no common rise. This answers an open question raised by Aval {\it et al.}.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube