Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 63 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 212 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 426 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

On the relation between kinetically constrained models of glass dynamics and the random first-order transition theory (1203.3166v2)

Published 14 Mar 2012 in cond-mat.stat-mech and cond-mat.dis-nn

Abstract: In this paper we revisit and extend the mapping between two apparently different classes of models. The first class contains the prototypical models described --at the mean-field level-- by the Random First Order Transition (RFOT) theory of the glass transition, called either "random XORSAT problem" (in the information theory community) or "diluted $p$-spin model" (in the spin glass community), undergoing a single-spin flip Glauber dynamics. The models in the second class are Kinetically Constrained Models (KCM): their Hamiltonian is that of independent spins in a constant magnetic field, hence their thermodynamics is completely trivial, but the dynamics is such that only groups of spin can flip together, thus implementing a kinetic constraint that induces a non-trivial dynamical behavior. A mapping between some representatives of these two classes has been known for long. Here we formally prove this mapping at the level of the master equation, and we apply it to the particular case of Bethe lattice models. This allows us to show that a RFOT model can be mapped exactly into a KCM. However, the natural order parameter for the RFOT model, namely the spin overlap, is mapped into a very complicated non-local function in the KCM. Therefore, if one were to study the KCM without knowing of the mapping onto the RFOT model, one would guess that its physics is quite different from the RFOT one. Our results instead suggest that these two apparently different descriptions of the glass transition are, at least in some case, closely related.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.