Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 160 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 39 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 98 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 196 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 437 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Seismic modelling of the $β\,$Cep star HD\,180642 (V1449\,Aql) (1109.0705v1)

Published 4 Sep 2011 in astro-ph.SR

Abstract: We present modelling of the $\beta\,$Cep star HD\,180642 based on its observational properties deduced from CoRoT and ground-based photometry as well as from time-resolved spectroscopy. We investigate whether present-day state-of-the-art models are able to explain the full seismic behaviour of this star, which has extended observational constraints for this type of pulsator. We constructed a dedicated database of stellar models and their oscillation modes tuned to fit the dominant radial mode frequency of HD\,180642, by means of varying the hydrogen content, metallicity, mass, age, and core overshooting parameter. We compared the seismic properties of these models with those observed. We find models that are able to explain the numerous observed oscillation properties of the star, for a narrow range in mass of 11.4--11.8\,M$_\odot$ and no or very mild overshooting (with up to 0.05 local pressure scale heights), except for an excitation problem of the $\ell=3$, p$_1$ mode. We deduce a rotation period of about 13\,d, which is fully compatible with recent magnetic field measurements. The seismic models do not support the earlier claim of solar-like oscillations in the star. We instead ascribe the power excess at high frequency to non-linear resonant mode coupling between the high-amplitude radial fundamental mode and several of the low-order pressure modes. We report a discrepancy between the seismic and spectroscopic gravity at the $2.5\sigma$ level.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.