Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 43 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 95 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 180 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 443 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 32 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Continuous closure, axes closure, and natural closure (1106.3462v2)

Published 17 Jun 2011 in math.AC and math.CV

Abstract: Let $R$ be a reduced affine $\mathbb C$-algebra, with corresponding affine algebraic set $X$. Let $\mathcal C(X)$ be the ring of continuous (Euclidean topology) $\mathbb C$-valued functions on $X$. Brenner defined the \emph{continuous closure} $I{\rm cont}$ of an ideal $I$ as $I\mathcal C(X) \cap R$. He also introduced an algebraic notion of \emph{axes closure} $I{\rm ax}$ that always contains $I{\rm cont}$, and asked whether they coincide. We extend the notion of axes closure to general Noetherian rings, defining $f \in I{\rm ax}$ if its image is in $IS$ for every homomorphism $R \to S$, where $S$ is a one-dimensional complete seminormal local ring. We also introduce the \emph{natural closure} $I\natural$ of $I$. One of many characterizations is $I\natural = I + {f \in R: \exists n >0 \text{ with } fn \in I{n+1}}$. We show that $I\natural \subseteq I{\rm ax}$, and that when continuous closure is defined, $I\natural \subseteq I{\rm cont }\subseteq I{\rm ax}$. Under mild hypotheses on the ring, we show that $I\natural= I{\rm ax}$ when $I$ is primary to a maximal ideal, and that if $I$ has no embedded primes, then $I = I\natural$ if and only if $I = I{\rm ax}$, so that $I{\rm cont}$ agrees as well. We deduce that in the polynomial ring $\mathbb C[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$, if $f = 0$ at all points where all of the ${\partial f \over \partial x_i}$ are 0, then $f \in ( {\partial f \over \partial x_1}, \, \ldots, \, {\partial f \over \partial x_n})R$. We characterize $I{\rm cont}$ for monomial ideals in polynomial rings over $\mathbb C$, but we show that the inequalities $I\natural \subset I{\rm cont}$ and $I{\rm cont} \subset I{\rm ax}$ can be strict for monomial ideals even in dimension 3. Thus, $I{\rm cont}$ and $I{\rm ax}$ need not agree, although we prove they are equal in $\mathbb C[x_1, x_2]$.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.