Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 79 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 99 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 199 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 444 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Early magnetic B-type stars: X-ray emission and wind properties (1106.0508v1)

Published 2 Jun 2011 in astro-ph.SR

Abstract: We present a comprehensive study of X-ray emission and wind properties of massive magnetic early B-type stars. Dedicated XMM-Newton observations were obtained for three stars xi1 CMa, V2052 Oph, and zeta Cas. We report the first detection of X-ray emission from V2052 Oph and zeta Cas. The observations show that the X-ray spectra of our program stars are quite soft. We compile the complete sample of early B-type stars with detected magnetic fields to date and existing X-ray measurements, in order to study whether the X-ray emission can be used as a general proxy for stellar magnetism. We find that hard and strong X-ray emission does not necessarily correlate with the presence of a magnetic field. We analyze the UV spectra of five non-supergiant B stars with magnetic fields by means of non-LTE iron-blanketed model atmospheres. The latter are calculated with the PoWR code, which treats the photosphere as well as the the wind, and also accounts for X-rays. Our models accurately fit the stellar photospheric spectra in the optical and the UV. The parameters of X-ray emission, temperature and flux are included in the model in accordance with observations. We confirm the earlier findings that the filling factors of X-ray emitting material are very high. Our analysis reveals that the magnetic early type B stars studied here have weak winds. The mass-loss rates are significantly lower than predicted by hydrodynamically consistent models. We find that, although the X-rays strongly affect the ionization structure of the wind, this effect is not sufficient in reducing the total radiative acceleration. When the X-rays are accounted for at the intensity and temperatures observed, there is still sufficient radiative acceleration to drive stronger mass-loss than we empirically infer from the UV spectral lines. (abridged)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube