Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 153 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 79 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 198 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 428 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Quasi-separatrix layers and three-dimensional reconnection diagnostics for line-tied tearing modes (1103.3651v1)

Published 18 Mar 2011 in physics.plasm-ph

Abstract: In three-dimensional magnetic configurations for a plasma in which no closed field line or magnetic null exists, no magnetic reconnection can occur, by the strictest definition of reconnection. A finitely long pinch with line-tied boundary conditions, in which all the magnetic field lines start at one end of the system and proceed to the opposite end, is an example of such a system. Nevertheless, for a long system of this type, the physical behavior in resistive magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) essentially involves reconnection. This has been explained in terms comparing the geometric and tearing widths [1, 2]. The concept of a quasi-separatrix layer[3, 4] was developed for such systems. In this paper we study a model for a line-tied system in which the corresponding periodic system has an unstable tearing mode. We analyze this system in terms of two magnetic field line diagnostics, the squashing factor[3-5] and the electrostatic potential difference used in kinematic reconnection studies[6, 7]. We discuss the physical and geometric significance of these two diagnostics and compare them in the context of discerning tearing-like behavior in line-tied modes. [1] G. L. Delzanno and J. M. Finn. Physics of Plasmas, 15(3):032904, 2008. [2] Y.-M. Huang and E. G. Zweibel. Physics of Plasmas, 16(4):042102, 2009. [3] E. R. Priest and P. D\'emoulin. J. Geophys. Res., 100(A12):23443-23463, 1995. [4] P. D\'emoulin, J. C. Henoux, E. R. Priest, and C. H. Mandrini. Astron. Astrophys., 308:643-655, Apr. 1996. [5] V. S. Titov and G. Hornig. Advances in Space Research, 29(7):1087-1092, 2002. [6] Y. Lau and J. M. Finn. The Astrophysical Journal, 350:672-691, Feb. 1990. [7] Y. Lau and J. M. Finn. The Astrophysical Journal, 366:577-591, 1991.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.