Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 22 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 72 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 211 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 438 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Exactly $n$-resolvable Topological Expansions (1008.5371v2)

Published 31 Aug 2010 in math.GN

Abstract: For $\kappa$ a cardinal, a space $X=(X,\sT)$ is $\kappa$-{\it resolvable} if $X$ admits $\kappa$-many pairwise disjoint $\sT$-dense subsets; $(X,\sT)$ is {\it exactly} $\kappa$-{\it resolvable} if it is $\kappa$-resolvable but not $\kappa+$-resolvable. The present paper complements and supplements the authors' earlier work, which showed for suitably restricted spaces $(X,\sT)$ and cardinals $\kappa\geq\lambda\geq\omega$ that $(X,\sT)$, if $\kappa$-resolvable, admits an expansion $\sU\supseteq\sT$, with $(X,\sU)$ Tychonoff if $(X,\sT)$ is Tychonoff, such that $(X,\sU)$ is $\mu$-resolvable for all $\mu<\lambda$ but is not $\lambda$-resolvable (cf. Theorem~3.3 of \cite{comfhu10}). Here the "finite case" is addressed. The authors show in ZFC for $1<n<\omega$: (a) every $n$-resolvable space $(X,\sT)$ admits an exactly $n$-resolvable expansion $\sU\supseteq\sT$; (b) in some cases, even with $(X,\sT)$ Tychonoff, no choice of $\sU$ is available such that $(X,\sU)$ is quasi-regular; (c) if $n$-resolvable, $(X,\sT)$ admits an exactly $n$-resolvable quasi-regular expansion $\sU$ if and only if either $(X,\sT)$ is itself exactly $n$-resolvable and quasi-regular or $(X,\sT)$ has a subspace which is either $n$-resolvable and nowhere dense or is $(2n)$-resolvable. In particular, every $\omega$-resolvable quasi-regular space admits an exactly $n$-resolvable quasi-regular expansion. Further, for many familiar topological properties $\PP$, one may choose $\sU$ so that $(X,\sU)\in\PP$ if $(X,\sT)\in\PP$.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.