Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 62 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 93 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 213 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 458 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

On the estimate of magnetic non-potentiality of sunspots derived using Hinode SOT/SP observations: Effect of polarimetric noise (1007.2505v1)

Published 15 Jul 2010 in astro-ph.SR

Abstract: The accuracy of Milne-Eddington (ME) inversions, used to retrieve the magnetic field vector, depends upon the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the spectro-polarimetric observations. The SNR in real observations varies from pixel to pixel, therefore the accuracy of the field vector also varies over the map. The aim of this work is to study the effect of polarimetric noise on the inference of magnetic field vector and the magnetic non-potentiality of a real sunspot. To this end, we use Hinode SOT/SP vector magnetogram of a real sunspot NOAA 10933 as an input to generate synthetic Stokes profiles under ME model assumptions. We then add normally-distributed polarimetric noise of the level 0.5\% of continuum intensity to these synthetic profiles and invert them again using ME code. This process is repeated 100 times with different realizations of noise. It is found that within most of the sunspot area (> 90% area) the spread in the (i) field strength is less than 8 Gauss, (ii) field inclination is less than 1 degree, and (iii) field azimuth is less than 5 degrees. Further, we determine the uncertainty in the magnetic non-potentiality of a sunspot as determined by the force-free parameter alpha_g and Spatially Averaged Signed Shear Angle (SASSA). It is found that for the sunspot studied here these parameters are alpha_g = -3.5 +/- 0.37 (x 10{-9} m{-1}) and SASSA = -1.68 +/- 0.014 degrees. This suggests that the SASSA is a less dispersion non-potentiality parameter as compared to alpha_g. Further, we examine the effect of increasing noise levels viz. 0.01, 0.1, 0.5 and 1% of continuum intensity and find that SASSA is less vulnerable to noise as compared to alpha_g parameter.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.