Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
153 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Inapproximability of the Tutte polynomial of a planar graph (0907.1724v3)

Published 10 Jul 2009 in cs.CC and math.CO

Abstract: The Tutte polynomial of a graph G is a two-variable polynomial T(G;x,y) that encodes many interesting properties of the graph. We study the complexity of the following problem, for rationals x and y: given as input a planar graph G, determine T(G;x,y). Vertigan completely mapped the complexity of exactly computing the Tutte polynomial of a planar graph. He showed that the problem can be solved in polynomial time if (x,y) is on the hyperbola H_q given by (x-1)(y-1)=q for q=1 or q=2 or if (x,y) is one of the two special points (x,y)=(-1,-1) or (x,y)=(1,1). Otherwise, the problem is #P-hard. In this paper, we consider the problem of approximating T(G;x,y), in the usual sense of "fully polynomial randomised approximation scheme" or FPRAS. Roughly speaking, an FPRAS is required to produce, in polynomial time and with high probability, an answer that has small relative error. Assuming that NP is different from RP, we show that there is no FPRAS for the Tutte polynomial in a large portion of the (x,y) plane. In particular, there is no FPRAS if x>1, y<-1 or if y>1, x<-1 or if x<0, y<0 and q>5. Also, there is no FPRAS if x<1, y<1 and q=3. For q>5, our result is intriguing because it shows that there is no FPRAS at (x,y)=(1-q/(1+epsilon),-epsilon) for any positive epsilon but it leaves open the limit point epsilon=0, which corresponds to approximately counting q-colourings of a planar graph.

Citations (19)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.