Worst-case gap between greedy lattice animals and optimal transport

Characterize the worst-case ratio between the optimal target water level \(\kappa(v)\) and the greedy-lattice-animal lower bound \(\mathrm{GLA}(v)\), under fixed barrel capacity and a fixed number of vertices.

Background

For every finite water-transport instance, the greedy lattice animal value GLA(v)\mathrm{GLA}(v) is a valid lower bound for the optimal value κ(v)\kappa(v). The paper provides a star-graph construction in which κ(v)\kappa(v) exceeds GLA(v)\mathrm{GLA}(v) by a factor of order log(n)\log(n), showing that the heuristic can be substantially suboptimal. The authors leave open a sharper characterization of how large this discrepancy can be in the worst case, particularly when barrel capacity and the number of vertices are fixed.

References

How far off can the lower bound based on greedy lattice animals, $\text{GLA}(v)$, be in the worst case (say for barrel capacity and number of vertices fixed)?

Water transport on finite graphs  (2501.16911 - Vilkas, 28 Jan 2025) in Section 'Observations and open problems'